Anonymous wrote:Four of his children are no longer American than because they were born to immigrant mothers.

Irrelevant, father and mother were legal and documented citizens when child was born

Irrelevant, similar to how England did this 20 years ago, it will not be applied retroactively.

But you already knew both of those things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

Wait, you remember prohibition? How old are you??

Anyhoo…have you somehow missed all your fellow gun nuts running around rambling about their 2A rights?

Yes, I do assume you all *learned* about prohibition, etc. and the fact that our founding fathers intended the constitution to be a living, changing document so that the dead would not rule over the living. Which is why it’s a head-scratcher when you all talk like the 2A is untouchable. But that’s over now! Thanks Trump!

Stop deflecting

No no. This is not a deflection. I’m not sure you understand what a deflection is. The thing that happened today can be applied to other amendments, such as the 2A. Republicans probably should have thought this through, but oh well!

700 page bills including major immigration or gun control items stapled with 500 horse-traded votes for states never pass.

Stick to a single issue, no horse trading. Clearly currently it’s Citizenship by Birth.

Start your own gun control thread elsewhere

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor.. I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.

Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

Wait, you remember prohibition? How old are you??

Anyhoo…have you somehow missed all your fellow gun nuts running around rambling about their 2A rights?

Yes, I do assume you all *learned* about prohibition, etc. and the fact that our founding fathers intended the constitution to be a living, changing document so that the dead would not rule over the living. Which is why it’s a head-scratcher when you all talk like the 2A is untouchable. But that’s over now! Thanks Trump!

Stop deflecting

No no. This is not a deflection. I’m not sure you understand what a deflection is. The thing that happened today can be applied to other amendments, such as the 2A. Republicans probably should have thought this through, but oh well!

The government has already infringed on the 2A

Now it can infringe on birthright citizenship

Four of his children are no longer American than because they were born to immigrant mothers.

so is it over?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

Wait, you remember prohibition? How old are you??

Anyhoo…have you somehow missed all your fellow gun nuts running around rambling about their 2A rights?

Yes, I do assume you all *learned* about prohibition, etc. and the fact that our founding fathers intended the constitution to be a living, changing document so that the dead would not rule over the living. Which is why it’s a head-scratcher when you all talk like the 2A is untouchable. But that’s over now! Thanks Trump!

Stop deflecting

No no. This is not a deflection. I’m not sure you understand what a deflection is. The thing that happened today can be applied to other amendments, such as the 2A. Republicans probably should have thought this through, but oh well!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

This.
MAGA doesn’t seem to understand the implications of this ruling. Constitutional amendments can now be appealed if someone with standing believes they no longer serve the purposes of the republic. The second amendment falls squarely in that category.

And no more forum shopping in Texas to take away abortion rights for women throughout the land.

Sometimes the fact that they can’t see past their own noses really comes in handy!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

Wait, you remember prohibition? How old are you??

Anyhoo…have you somehow missed all your fellow gun nuts running around rambling about their 2A rights?

Yes, I do assume you all *learned* about prohibition, etc. and the fact that our founding fathers intended the constitution to be a living, changing document so that the dead would not rule over the living. Which is why it’s a head-scratcher when you all talk like the 2A is untouchable. But that’s over now! Thanks Trump!

Stop deflecting

Anonymous wrote:Can’t believe USA still has it.

It’s a well known fact everywhere it’s there to be taken advantage of, a meal ticket- anchor child or someone who can sponsor you and the whole family once age 18.

Illegals’ anchor babies, Asian birth tourists, temp workers, temp grad students.

Everyone wants a USA baby who can help keep them in USA and sponsor more from the homeland .

And remit money back. Lots of money.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

Wait, you remember prohibition? How old are you??

Anyhoo…have you somehow missed all your fellow gun nuts running around rambling about their 2A rights?

Yes, I do assume you all *learned* about prohibition, etc. and the fact that our founding fathers intended the constitution to be a living, changing document so that the dead would not rule over the living. Which is why it’s a head-scratcher when you all talk like the 2A is untouchable. But that’s over now! Thanks Trump!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

This.
MAGA doesn’t seem to understand the implications of this ruling. Constitutional amendments can now be appealed if someone with standing believes they no longer serve the purposes of the republic. The second amendment falls squarely in that category.

And no more forum shopping in Texas to take away abortion rights for women throughout the land.

Anonymous wrote:Can’t believe USA still has it.

It’s a well known fact everywhere it’s there to be taken advantage of, a meal ticket- anchor child or someone who can sponsor you and the whole family once age 18.

Illegals’ anchor babies, Asian birth tourists, temp workers, temp grad students.

Everyone wants a USA baby who can help keep them in USA and sponsor more from the homeland .

And remit money back. Lots of money.

There is almost no chance it gets taken out of the constitution so we are stuck with it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!

No mas anchor bebes?!

Uh oh. Who’s gonna tell Barron, Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric?

Educated literate ones don’t count. Net positive

And don’t forget the good ol’: where or where can we go? America is all my 3 yo has known!