Anonymous wrote:Crazy responses. Someone like that has a decent shop at top schools. Not HYPSM but good schools. The pointiest kids are often awkward and well rounded kids help establish a great campus community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
I'm assuming that you aren't implicitly talking about admission to T30 schools. My son had a similar profile, lesser in fact, and got admitted to 3 T50 schools (2 public, 1 private), one a transfer to a private after one year in community college (applied ED1 and deferred to RD) and waitlisted at another public. He got admitted to 5 T100 schools. He came close to going to a really good Top 150 school, I wouldn't dismiss them if they are a fit.
You may have to be aggressive and identify an ED school if he is certain that he likes it and will attend it. For others, I'd recommend EA for the others, especially OOS public schools if this option is available (it isn't at UW-Seattle and UC).
He went to a public, Title I high school, and wrote good, low key essays that spoke to his character and ability to respect people in a diverse community based upon his experience. I think that he was able to establish a a more personal connection with the AOs by doing so. My advice is that he should present himself in a unpretentious, sincere way, I think that this goes a long way, and he will end up at a place that wants him for who he is.
Here son is at a private school with top grades and test scores. Why would she be aiming for T150 schools?
What????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Pointy” hasn’t been a thing in about 10 years.
They stopped being interested in porcupines. They are looking for unicorns. OP is not at porcupines level.
Naw they just prefer brown and trans people, ideally first generation. And legacies and athletes. No Asians need apply.
Seriously most Asian kids are boring as dirt. Their parents didn't prioritize having a personality. Not all, but i know my fair share. This isn't Asia. Scoring super high on test and gpa doesn’t mean you will be a good addition to a college's incoming class.
- Asian
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Pointy” hasn’t been a thing in about 10 years.
They stopped being interested in porcupines. They are looking for unicorns. OP is not at porcupines level.
Naw they just prefer brown and trans people, ideally first generation. And legacies and athletes. No Asians need apply.
Seriously most Asian kids are boring as dirt. Their parents didn't prioritize having a personality. Not all, but i know my fair share. This isn't Asia. Scoring super high on test and gpa doesn’t mean you will be a good addition to a college's incoming class.
- Asian
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
Honestly, this sounds like a Dartmouth kid, provided he's also outdoorsy.
If you haven't visited D, you should this fall and check out the Entrepreneurship center: https://magnuson.dartmouth.edu/
SLACs love this kind of kid too.
If Dartmouth isn't his thing, also check out:
Vanderbilt (esp given the leadership and debate)
Duke
Stanford (have seen more "star" academic kids without spikes recently, and they LOVE their interdisciplinary entrepreneurs with multiple skill sets)
Rice
WashU
If you are at a private school, look at the kids who were admitted to these and other schools from HS. Did they have a spike? Which ones had no spike? Your kid might actually know.
If you answer a few questions on entrepreneurship, it might become evidence that that's a mini spike.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
I'm assuming that you aren't implicitly talking about admission to T30 schools. My son had a similar profile, lesser in fact, and got admitted to 3 T50 schools (2 public, 1 private), one a transfer to a private after one year in community college (applied ED1 and deferred to RD) and waitlisted at another public. He got admitted to 5 T100 schools. He came close to going to a really good Top 150 school, I wouldn't dismiss them if they are a fit.
You may have to be aggressive and identify an ED school if he is certain that he likes it and will attend it. For others, I'd recommend EA for the others, especially OOS public schools if this option is available (it isn't at UW-Seattle and UC).
He went to a public, Title I high school, and wrote good, low key essays that spoke to his character and ability to respect people in a diverse community based upon his experience. I think that he was able to establish a a more personal connection with the AOs by doing so. My advice is that he should present himself in a unpretentious, sincere way, I think that this goes a long way, and he will end up at a place that wants him for who he is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
I'm assuming that you aren't implicitly talking about admission to T30 schools. My son had a similar profile, lesser in fact, and got admitted to 3 T50 schools (2 public, 1 private), one a transfer to a private after one year in community college (applied ED1 and deferred to RD) and waitlisted at another public. He got admitted to 5 T100 schools. He came close to going to a really good Top 150 school, I wouldn't dismiss them if they are a fit.
You may have to be aggressive and identify an ED school if he is certain that he likes it and will attend it. For others, I'd recommend EA for the others, especially OOS public schools if this option is available (it isn't at UW-Seattle and UC).
He went to a public, Title I high school, and wrote good, low key essays that spoke to his character and ability to respect people in a diverse community based upon his experience. I think that he was able to establish a a more personal connection with the AOs by doing so. My advice is that he should present himself in a unpretentious, sincere way, I think that this goes a long way, and he will end up at a place that wants him for who he is.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any colleges/universities that look favorably on a well-rounded kid these days? Excels in range of subjects (but mostly math), high rigor coursework/high test scores, sporty, awards in debate and entrepreneurship but nothing national level, some student leadership, loves being involved at school, lots of volunteer hours, well-liked by teachers. But wouldn’t naturally develop pointy areas just for purposes of developing an application narrative. He thinks that’s phony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Pointy” hasn’t been a thing in about 10 years.
They stopped being interested in porcupines. They are looking for unicorns. OP is not at porcupines level.
Naw they just prefer brown and trans people, ideally first generation. And legacies and athletes. No Asians need apply.