Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think most Americans are MAGA. But I definitely think most Americans don’t want what the Democrats are selling. They need to move way, way more center and drop the “progressive” agenda to win again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You lost all seven swing states.
Have a nice day, progressives. :wink:
Swing state Trump voter here. Who voted for Obama twice. I know people on DCUM claim we don't exist but the numbers clearly show otherwise. And besides, how dare anyone challenge my "lived experience."
Trump may be a esthetically unpalatable but the other choice started out being someone who is literally dead. Then they installed someone who spoke like her brain chip was glitching.
So by default I'm MAGA.
“Esthetically unpalatable”? The bronze makeup and tacky decor are only the 52,384th worst thing about Trump.
“literally dead” Do you understand what “literally” means?
I love when people claim to have voted for Obama twice, but then they’re like “their side had an elderly senile candidate, and that was just unacceptable, so I had no choice but to vote for the other side’s elderly senile candidate, a convicted felon who surrounds himself with the most vile incompetents imaginable.”
“One side used pronouns, so I had no choice but to vote for the reincarnation of the Third Reich”.
If your moral compass spins around this wildly at the slightest puff of a breeze, you were MAGA all along.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think most Americans are MAGA. But I definitely think most Americans don’t want what the Democrats are selling. They need to move way, way more center and drop the “progressive” agenda to win again.
I agree that the Democrats should move more center but, building on your point, Americans don't want want the GOP/MAGA is selling either. They need to move more center as well. The Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 as the political pendulum naturally swings.
The center doesn’t necessarily mean status quo, incremental change at the margins though. It actually might mean bold proposals that make life better for people in the center of the bell curve.
But the democrat way to “make life better” is to increase things the government provides. Free this, free that, etc. I think most people don’t want to see a bunch of social programs ran by the government (at the expense of those that pay taxes).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think most Americans are MAGA. But I definitely think most Americans don’t want what the Democrats are selling. They need to move way, way more center and drop the “progressive” agenda to win again.
I agree that the Democrats should move more center but, building on your point, Americans don't want want the GOP/MAGA is selling either. They need to move more center as well. The Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 as the political pendulum naturally swings.
The center doesn’t necessarily mean status quo, incremental change at the margins though. It actually might mean bold proposals that make life better for people in the center of the bell curve.
Anonymous wrote:You lost all seven swing states.
Have a nice day, progressives.![]()
Anonymous wrote:You lost all seven swing states.
Have a nice day, progressives.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think most Americans are MAGA. But I definitely think most Americans don’t want what the Democrats are selling. They need to move way, way more center and drop the “progressive” agenda to win again.
I agree that the Democrats should move more center but, building on your point, Americans don't want want the GOP/MAGA is selling either. They need to move more center as well. The Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 as the political pendulum naturally swings.
The center doesn’t necessarily mean status quo, incremental change at the margins though. It actually might mean bold proposals that make life better for people in the center of the bell curve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You lost all seven swing states.
Have a nice day, progressives. :wink:
Swing state Trump voter here. Who voted for Obama twice. I know people on DCUM claim we don't exist but the numbers clearly show otherwise. And besides, how dare anyone challenge my "lived experience."
Trump may be a esthetically unpalatable but the other choice started out being someone who is literally dead. Then they installed someone who spoke like her brain chip was glitching.
So by default I'm MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:Why are the Republican congresspeople so freaking terrified by the MAGAs then? They must be in big enough numbers to threaten elections.
Are you telling me a vocal minority makes people this scared? They are a bunch of cowards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
:roll:
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.