Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

Exactly.

I’m so happy no one posting here lives in LA… I look forward to what happens when all this boot licking garbage lands on your respective doorsteps.

Will you stay on your knees to comply or will you stand. Only time will tell…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

Oh that one's really good for the recruitment marketing. I forgot about the kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Agreed, problem solved. Citizens (and illegals) should respect the military anyway.

The military should respect the law and constitution. They should be held to the highest standards given their weapons. Why are you excusing them?

They haven’t done anything, other than show up, as ordered. Their presence does seem to have a calming effect on the locals.

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Throw rocks? I saw two videos of LAPD shoot women with rubber bullets, and one was a journalist just doing her job. These women were doing nothing to warrant being shot. Next time they may not be rubber bullets.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

Well, they should have been around to shoot mobs of people attempting to breach security at the US Capitol Building. No one will argue with that! If Federal buildings are being attacked by angry mobs anywhere in this country, they should be shot immediately in a post 9/11 world. If kids are throwing rocks at the US Military, they shouldn't be shot immediately but they should be detained and seriously punished. All of this is simple common sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Agreed, problem solved. Citizens (and illegals) should respect the military anyway.

The military should respect the law and constitution. They should be held to the highest standards given their weapons. Why are you excusing them?

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Oh so now we’re going to have the military shoot kids who throw rocks?

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

Military and LEOs arresting people for protesting their presence and detaining/disappearing people with no due process is not "FA", it is what is the right of every person. It's in our Constitution. You're a POS for pretending otherwise and being ok with it.
You wanna live under a dictator, move the F to Russian or N. Korea.

Anonymous wrote:There will be casualties. There will be revolution.

That’s not a good thing and we should all strive to avoid such an outcome. This isn’t a joke.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Seriously. All those red state county Sheriffs know exactly where to find undocumented workers, but they give them sanctuary.

Yet we never hear the phrase "sanctuary farms".

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Agreed, problem solved. Citizens (and illegals) should respect the military anyway.

I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.