Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She has also mandated her principals use/provided them with materials from her side hustle…
She did a required “DCPS” training after school for my school and it was literally just a Relay course rebranded with DCPS logos. It was also very basic, like how to ask good questions or something like that. But definitely hard to tell if it was a DCPS training or a Relay training and I wonder who was paying her for that time since it was after teachers’ contract hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Without this one, I would do differentiated small groups. She did a walkthrough and said we can’t do differentiated groups because struggling students weren’t benefiting from the discourse of advanced students. So now everyone just gets the same instruction.
You can’t *exclusively* do differentiated small groups, it just needs to be in addition to tier 1 instruction. It’s built into the math block schedule for example.
Yeah, that’s what I did. Everyone sat through the hour math block, my struggling students basically did the best they could, my advanced students just sat bored. Then when I had my 30-minute needs based small groups I pulled the kids who didn’t get it during the whole group lesson and retaught it.
If I didn’t have to worry about going too slow for the advanced kids, I probably could get them the lesson in 15 minutes. Then I could double up or extend the learning for 15 minutes for the advanced kids. No one would be bored or lost, they would all be getting what they need.
It’s a model and it works, I just prefer to more efficiently meet kids’ needs. I don’t like sitting through PD on stuff I already know, I can’t imagine kids want to either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Without this one, I would do differentiated small groups. She did a walkthrough and said we can’t do differentiated groups because struggling students weren’t benefiting from the discourse of advanced students. So now everyone just gets the same instruction.
You can’t *exclusively* do differentiated small groups, it just needs to be in addition to tier 1 instruction. It’s built into the math block schedule for example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Without this one, I would do differentiated small groups. She did a walkthrough and said we can’t do differentiated groups because struggling students weren’t benefiting from the discourse of advanced students. So now everyone just gets the same instruction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Without this one, I would do differentiated small groups. She did a walkthrough and said we can’t do differentiated groups because struggling students weren’t benefiting from the discourse of advanced students. So now everyone just gets the same instruction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Yes. We would be without a mid-level manager position. Given DC’s budget issues that seems like a good layer to go
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Without Instructional Supts, you'd be at the mercy of the principal, as they would not be managed. Be careful what you ask for.
Anonymous wrote:Most ISSs are useless positions. They don’t do anything that positively impacts schools. At best they are neutral, at worst they hinder learning through mandates that are a waste of time. Literally wasting your children’s instructional time so thry can look like their job it’s important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No horse in this race, but the defenses of this person seem very much from either her or her people.
If you only knew the way school systems work. There are many people who, having been in this field for a long time and become well-versed in a multitude of subjects, may prefer one program over another. If the program is successful and has proven results, there may be an opportunity to help promote it in another district, state, or elsewhere. Teachers, for example, often take jobs scoring assessments for other districts, or may offer tutoring services to STUDENTS. This is not always a conflict of interest as long as the individual stays within the parameters.
It is discouraging to see people speak as if they have the right to dictate what this lady does with her time, as if they own her. She reported her mistake herself, which means she has nothing to hide. Instead of the dog whistle language, just name what the REAL issue is...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No horse in this race, but the defenses of this person seem very much from either her or her people.
If you only knew the way school systems work. There are many people who, having been in this field for a long time and become well-versed in a multitude of subjects, may prefer one program over another. If the program is successful and has proven results, there may be an opportunity to help promote it in another district, state, or elsewhere. Teachers, for example, often take jobs scoring assessments for other districts, or may offer tutoring services to STUDENTS. This is not always a conflict of interest as long as the individual stays within the parameters.
It is discouraging to see people speak as if they have the right to dictate what this lady does with her time, as if they own her. She reported her mistake herself, which means she has nothing to hide. Instead of the dog whistle language, just name what the REAL issue is...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She has also mandated her principals use/provided them with materials from her side hustle…
This. Conflict of interest.