Anonymous wrote:They should have scrapped this as soon as Shrevewood lost half its students to Lemon Road. Karl Frisch is such a jerk. NOBODY asked for this school. Shrevewood parents asked for an evaluation for redistricting. FCPS was going to do that, and then Covid hit and it was paused. Karl F'ing Frisch slid in there and torpedoed the whole thing by saying "Actually, I have a new school for you" and Shrevewood parents were LIVID. We were ready for rezoning the following fall which is what they promised us, we did not ask for a new school.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 99.9% certain there is one bitter parent in here posting back and forth with all of this Karl Frisch hate. As ankther poster put it, she (maybe a he?) gives off a serious "Mean Girls" vibe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread feels like an echo chamber with one person anonymously posting and responding to his/herself to suggest a consensus about KF. I wish these boards were better moderated to attract actual conversation and debate. Let's do away with the catty "mean girls" attitudes.

We live in his district and I literally don't know a single person that doesn't think he's horrible. I wish someone would run against him next time that isn't a gun nut.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true what they said about you, a thousand cats, an opiate problem and your interest in frequenting playgrounds without your kids? I think there is a thread about that. You should go chase it down! Is my ability to make unverifiable smears at the same level as yours?

Oh, here you go, since you’re now clearly losing it. Note that it wasn’t just that Frisch lied but that he did so “yet again.”

https://defendinged.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Exhibit-L-Pages-from-Separated-PLF-Memo-Master-122-PLF-Memo-ISO-MSJ-with-unredacted-and-unsealed-exhibits-12.22.21-copy-3.pdf

It aligns with the experience the rest of us have had with Frisch, where he lies to constituents and makes promises he has no intention of keeping.

Wait, so this one text message which has somehow been made public is evidence of actual lying? Geez, the standards on here are pretty lax. Do better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true what they said about you, a thousand cats, an opiate problem and your interest in frequenting playgrounds without your kids? I think there is a thread about that. You should go chase it down! Is my ability to make unverifiable smears at the same level as yours?

Oh, here you go, since you’re now clearly losing it. Note that it wasn’t just that Frisch lied but that he did so “yet again.”

https://defendinged.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Exhibit-L-Pages-from-Separated-PLF-Memo-Master-122-PLF-Memo-ISO-MSJ-with-unredacted-and-unsealed-exhibits-12.22.21-copy-3.pdf

It aligns with the experience the rest of us have had with Frisch, where he lies to constituents and makes promises he has no intention of keeping.

Anonymous wrote:This thread feels like an echo chamber with one person anonymously posting and responding to his/herself to suggest a consensus about KF. I wish these boards were better moderated to attract actual conversation and debate. Let's do away with the catty "mean girls" attitudes.

Anonymous wrote:Is it true what they said about you, a thousand cats, an opiate problem and your interest in frequenting playgrounds without your kids? I think there is a thread about that. You should go chase it down! Is my ability to make unverifiable smears at the same level as yours?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's a deflection. If you want to argue about wasting $85 million, great! If you want to talk about overcrowded schools, great! If you want to talk about actual instances which make him unqualified, go for it. As a member of Fairfax County, I want to hear it. But to resort to insults and catty language, it doesn't help anyone.

Frisch is a liar who made promises he never intended to keep, and a poor School Board representative for his district. His "signature project" as a School Board member is a wasteful elementary school that local residents do not want and which diverts resources that could be put to better use elsewhere.

He's also engaged in a range of other behaviors that call into question his suitability for elected office.

DP and *yawn*, you keep saying the same tired things in different ways with broad strokes that underscore the PP's point about deflection.

On Dunn-Loring, the SB has asked Facilities to look into swing space solutions as a more time-and-cost-effective way to renovate schools in the future. I wonder if they might end up using Dunn-Loring for this purpose, though I have no idea where the surrounding schools sit in the renovation lineup. If not, they should be including it in the current boundary study. Even if it's not going to be ready for 26-27, we should know what the proposed boundaries would look like when it does open, given how much time and energy is being spent on this process. They can have an interim plan for boundaries for a year or two gap until it opens (I don't know the planned open date), but certainly shouldn't be ignoring the matter in their planning.

"Tired" is what we are of Karl Frisch and his incompetence.

You'll keep pivoting and making up new excuses for why Dunn Loring is getting built, whether it's to anticipate all the surrounding schools turning into Title I schools (that won't happen), using Dunn Loring as swing space for surrounding schools as they get renovated (none of the surrounding schools are identified in the current queue for future renovations), etc.

The fact is that this school only exists because Karl Frisch wanted to make sure a school was NOT built at Blake Lane Park. It's very odd to have a School Board members whose priorities are shaped by a desire to avoid an already planned school in his district. He is an incompetent flake.

DP. It's clear you're speaking from a place of anger. Not sure if that's based on the new boundary review, personal animus or something else altogether. Nonetheless, your tone is extremely off putting and it makes it hard to take your position seriously. The name calling, the unsupported conclusions make you seem irrationally bitter. As suggested by one of the previous responders, this forum should be a place for debate and discussion. The way you interact with others could be a lot more constructive.

Spare us the lecture. Frisch is dishonest, he neglects his constituents, and he’s got the majority of the rest of the School Board going along with his wasting tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money on a boondoggle. His expenses in office, along with McDaniel’s, should be subject to a full audit by the state AG.

Spare us the angry rant and point us to verifiable facts. Preferably from a reliable source. Thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's a deflection. If you want to argue about wasting $85 million, great! If you want to talk about overcrowded schools, great! If you want to talk about actual instances which make him unqualified, go for it. As a member of Fairfax County, I want to hear it. But to resort to insults and catty language, it doesn't help anyone.

Frisch is a liar who made promises he never intended to keep, and a poor School Board representative for his district. His "signature project" as a School Board member is a wasteful elementary school that local residents do not want and which diverts resources that could be put to better use elsewhere.

He's also engaged in a range of other behaviors that call into question his suitability for elected office.

DP and *yawn*, you keep saying the same tired things in different ways with broad strokes that underscore the PP's point about deflection.

On Dunn-Loring, the SB has asked Facilities to look into swing space solutions as a more time-and-cost-effective way to renovate schools in the future. I wonder if they might end up using Dunn-Loring for this purpose, though I have no idea where the surrounding schools sit in the renovation lineup. If not, they should be including it in the current boundary study. Even if it's not going to be ready for 26-27, we should know what the proposed boundaries would look like when it does open, given how much time and energy is being spent on this process. They can have an interim plan for boundaries for a year or two gap until it opens (I don't know the planned open date), but certainly shouldn't be ignoring the matter in their planning.

"Tired" is what we are of Karl Frisch and his incompetence.

You'll keep pivoting and making up new excuses for why Dunn Loring is getting built, whether it's to anticipate all the surrounding schools turning into Title I schools (that won't happen), using Dunn Loring as swing space for surrounding schools as they get renovated (none of the surrounding schools are identified in the current queue for future renovations), etc.

The fact is that this school only exists because Karl Frisch wanted to make sure a school was NOT built at Blake Lane Park. It's very odd to have a School Board members whose priorities are shaped by a desire to avoid an already planned school in his district. He is an incompetent flake.

DP. It's clear you're speaking from a place of anger. Not sure if that's based on the new boundary review, personal animus or something else altogether. Nonetheless, your tone is extremely off putting and it makes it hard to take your position seriously. The name calling, the unsupported conclusions make you seem irrationally bitter. As suggested by one of the previous responders, this forum should be a place for debate and discussion. The way you interact with others could be a lot more constructive.

Spare us the lecture. Frisch is dishonest, he neglects his constituents, and he’s got the majority of the rest of the School Board going along with his wasting tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money on a boondoggle. His expenses in office, along with McDaniel’s, should be subject to a full audit by the state AG.

Anonymous wrote:Why don't they just build a school at Blake Lane then with the new money? Forget about Dunn Loring.