Anonymous wrote:My child got in on appeal with very good work samples. A short story, poems, math puzzles, and creative writing/art
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Wouldnt it have been easier to just say you got in on appeal, in lieu of itemizing everything? We too got in on appeal but elected not to brag about it
Geez - I think they were trying to be helpful to others going through the same process? I would much rather someone post their stats and give background on their application, versus just stating their child got in on appeal - that helps nobody.
Anonymous wrote:Not in!!!!
3rd grade
NNAT 130
COGAT 140
Reading iReady 96 percentile
Math iReady 99 percentile
Additional work samples submitted as part of appeal. I don't know what the committee is looking for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Wouldnt it have been easier to just say you got in on appeal, in lieu of itemizing everything? We too got in on appeal but elected not to brag about it
Geez - I think they were trying to be helpful to others going through the same process? I would much rather someone post their stats and give background on their application, versus just stating their child got in on appeal - that helps nobody.
Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Wouldnt it have been easier to just say you got in on appeal, in lieu of itemizing everything? We too got in on appeal but elected not to brag about it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Curious as to why your child needs AAP?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not in :/
2nd grade (was in pool)
NNAT 129
COGAT 140
WISC 134
VALLS 714
MATH 454/99th %ile
Also McLean pyramid. What a wild, opaque system.
How were the HOPE scores. That has to be the only reason a child with these scores wouldn’t get in. HOPE scores should only be included as a value add to find students that testing misses, not to keep out 99th percentile children. Please reach out to your principal to request principal placement into the AAP class.
Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Anonymous wrote:In on appeal
2nd grade
In pool LB pyramid
NNAT 123
COGAT 126
WISC 133 (verbal comp 146)
MATH iReady 72%
VALLS 99%
Grades almost all 4s even in math.
We had a weak HOPE. 1R, 1O, rest S.
Child has an IEP for Autism. Didn’t include it but provided lots of information and made clear there were no behavioral issues.
On appeal we provided WISC and WPPSY with letter from neuropsychologist and took the opportunity to submit more work samples than what had been provided in first submittal. Work samples were rocketry projects, designing and building functional structures, a business, and creative pursuits.
Suspect that since our in school testing wasn’t great that we got in based on very strong work samples, good grades and WISC.
Anonymous wrote:129/130 is not a high nnat score