Anonymous wrote:Oh my.
Such deflection.
Law enforcement needs probable cause and needs to identify itself. Two elements lacking here.

We remain a nation of laws. Extrajudicial detention is not acceptable.

There is no obligation to provide identity in the absence of reasonable, articulable suspicion (RAS) that the person has committed a crime, is committing a crime, or is about to commit a crime. In the absence of that RAS, the police can request ID, and demanding ID is a violation of the 4th Ammendment.

Oh my.
Such deflection.
Law enforcement needs probable cause and needs to identify itself. Two elements lacking here.

We remain a nation of laws. Extrajudicial detention is not acceptable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing it is on video. DHS says that he was interfering with an arrest. The truth will come out one way or the other.

Well, they say a lot of things, but unfortunately not much to come out of this administration is believable or credible anymore.

Who knows. One thing we do know. The last administration told us the "border was closed."
Did you believe that?

Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing it is on video. DHS says that he was interfering with an arrest. The truth will come out one way or the other.

Well, they say a lot of things, but unfortunately not much to come out of this administration is believable or credible anymore.