Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, because your stupid redneck relatives are really going to be open to what a lawyer says.
Like pigs in mud, they're wallowing in aggressive ignorance. They don't want out of it
+1
You say and do nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is a lawyer going to be understood by someone who is a redneck? I imagine they barely read at a 3rd grade level.
+1
Have you tried speaking very slowly using only words with two syllables or less? I think gorillas can understand 1-2 syllable words so they should probably be able to?
Would that also work with you? Maybe that’s why you’re having so much trouble with my posts? I need to dumb them down even further.*
* - please note how I only used words with two syllables or less. Except for syllables.
Seems like you misunderstood, predictably.
Let me try again, genius.
Ooh-ooh-ah-ah. Ooh-ooh-ah-ah.
That better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is a lawyer going to be understood by someone who is a redneck? I imagine they barely read at a 3rd grade level.
+1
Have you tried speaking very slowly using only words with two syllables or less? I think gorillas can understand 1-2 syllable words so they should probably be able to?
Anonymous wrote:Stop using the term "redneck." You need to get out of your bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is a lawyer going to be understood by someone who is a redneck? I imagine they barely read at a 3rd grade level.
+1
Have you tried speaking very slowly using only words with two syllables or less? I think gorillas can understand 1-2 syllable words so they should probably be able to?
Would that also work with you? Maybe that’s why you’re having so much trouble with my posts? I need to dumb them down even further.*
* - please note how I only used words with two syllables or less. Except for syllables.
Anonymous wrote:I talk to a MAGA acquaintance regularly. He doesn't read news outside of his "trusted sources", which are different from mine. I keep in touch with him because we have a background in science in common, and sometimes I see a glimmer of doubt when I explain my side of things. We don't talk about cultural matters, which are by definition subjective. We exchange what we believe to be facts. We butted heads on the Abrego Garcia case recently, on what was known about him, and realized we weren't at all operating on the same factual basis.
I think the important thing is to keep talking.