Anonymous wrote:Regarding analogy between favoritism at swim and favoritism for work and teaching kids to adapt, I agree with teaching kids coping mechanisms and trying to help them be attentive and find the joy regardless.
However, people (and swimmers) have options. At some point, it’s typically not best to keep banging your head against a wall (or in the case of swimming, spending thousands of dollars and countless hours) doing something where you feel undervalued and not appreciated. One difference is a swimmer is a paying customer and may not feel like they’re getting their monies worth with the services offered when coaches don’t favor them but do favor others. That's when people move on.
Alternative options will present themselves at some point. Most people these days leave jobs where they feel they aren’t being recognized and appreciated. Usually they end up with promotions and raises.
Anonymous wrote:Regarding analogy between favoritism at swim and favoritism for work and teaching kids to adapt, I agree with teaching kids coping mechanisms and trying to help them be attentive and find the joy regardless.
However, people (and swimmers) have options. At some point, it’s typically not best to keep banging your head against a wall (or in the case of swimming, spending thousands of dollars and countless hours) doing something where you feel undervalued and not appreciated. One difference is a swimmer is a paying customer and may not feel like they’re getting their monies worth with the services offered when coaches don’t favor them but do favor others. That's when people move on.
Alternative options will present themselves at some point. Most people these days leave jobs where they feel they aren’t being recognized and appreciated. Usually they end up with promotions and raises.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even the OP of this (really pedantic) thread misses an opportunity:
(1) Favoritism disadvantages people with neurodivergencies;
(2) Most coaches (outside of perhaps special educators) are ill-equipped to see beyond the conformist-behaved child and work within a neurodivergency rather than push against it and blackball it;
(3) Many replies to this post support (1) and (2), suggesting an outcast status — notwithstanding swimming ability — for children who are unable to conform to average (or exceptional) attention span, average (or exceptional) engagement, and average (or exceptional) communication.
This post says more about people’s disfavor for neurodivergent children than it does about private planes and giving a kid a spot in an A meet (which, BTW, you can look up the private plane borrower’s children to see where the facts stand to that end).
We need to do better.
I read this as, “my kid requires significant special and extra attention for the same price as everyone else. S/he doesn’t get that attention, and that’s a problem. Society is broken.” I’d love to be corrected if this isn’t the case.
Anonymous wrote:Disagree that fast = favorite, based on conversations with coaches. There can be many reasons for being a favorite, such as work ethic, personality, or the kids parents offer you rides on their private jet.
Anonymous wrote:What are examples of favoritism vs. not? I believe it, just curious for examples. Like A meets I’ve read things like not picking the fastest swimmers for relays, or even not picking the fastest swimmers for individual events. What some non-meet examples that people have seen in person or their kid told them?
Anonymous wrote:What are examples of favoritism vs. not? I believe it, just curious for examples. Like A meets I’ve read things like not picking the fastest swimmers for relays, or even not picking the fastest swimmers for individual events. What some non-meet examples that people have seen in person or their kid told them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People become favorites because they are fast, they are not fast because they are favorites. If your swimmer is mediocre all the attention in the world isn’t going to change that. Sorry to burst your bubble on that one.
Op here. My post was inspired so to speak from the coach in a private plane thread.
People there were saying that the times speak for themselves and favoritism can’t happen in swimming.
A coach can totally discourage a child in every sport, including swimming, and make them hate it. A coach could also favor certain children, treat them better and design practices to suit those kids and their needs moreso than others.
A swimmer doesn’t become a favorite because they’re fast. However, even if that’s the reason, it’s still unfair and unethical to all the other kids in the team.
You must be the owner of said private jet.
I have no affiliation with York or that coach, but I do know that he lives rent free in some heads here in DCUM land since you have created yet another thread about it. A coach can definitely discourage a swimmer, generally though it’s the kid that spends most of their time in the bathroom to skip sets, talks when the coach is explaining the set or is otherwise not engaged and paying attention. The attentive kids and the ones who act like they want to be there get positive reinforcement. But in terms of truly being a coach’s favorite, come on, like in any sport it’s usually the kids that perform the best. Coaches may have a soft spot for the kid that is earnest, loves the sport and tries hard even if they will never be elite, but I don’t know that you can call that favoritism. This is how life works, not just sports.
Agree. For most coaches / good coaches.
DD did have one summer swim coach who had really blatant favorites though (and she was a fast one for her age group and is always an earnest beaver kind of kid with practices). If you weren’t a fav you could definitely tell. She switched teams after a couple years because it was just so frustrating a dynamic.