Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on your NW, there is a point where remaining 60% is a lot of money and has huge buying power. Putting 1/3 or 1/2 of your NW into RE you occupy isn’t generally smart way to allocate money as it doesn’t work hard enough for you. But it all depends, it works out for some people. It really really all depends on how wealthy one is. For middle classes most of their NW is their home, the richer people get the lower this ratio gets just because of purchasing power.
Ah so rental properties don’t count? We have most of our money in real estate but 80% of that is in rental properties. We probably only have less than 20% based on the equity we have in the house we live in.
Anonymous wrote:Depends on your NW, there is a point where remaining 60% is a lot of money and has huge buying power. Putting 1/3 or 1/2 of your NW into RE you occupy isn’t generally smart way to allocate money as it doesn’t work hard enough for you. But it all depends, it works out for some people. It really really all depends on how wealthy one is. For middle classes most of their NW is their home, the richer people get the lower this ratio gets just because of purchasing power.
Anonymous wrote:Net worth is a useless metric.
Anonymous wrote:Direct exposure is about 50%. Indirect increases exposure to close to 90%.
But out net worth is extremely high and real estate is where we hold most of our wealth.
Anonymous wrote:0%. All in stock market and crypto after selling three properties. I should inherit several homes, but not buying any time soon.