Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Homeowner was black, teen was white. Allegedly the homeowner thought the teens were trying to break in.
How can they be trying to break in if they are ringing the door bell? That’s… not what breaking in is…
How do you confirm that a house is empty before you break in?
You knock persistently "as a prank" to see if anyone comes out.
Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where does it say in the article that he was shot in the back? I didn’t read that in there anywhere.
The actual facts, more of which are probably not in the short article, are what matter. In Virginia you can shot someone if you think your life is in imminent danger. If a group of male teens are banging on my door, on my porch, trespassing on my property, and not leaving right away, what else do I think theyre there to do but break in.
I had teens at 4am come into my fenced in yard, wander around, high out of their mind. My bedroom is in the front of the house, they woke me up, I looked out the window, opened the window and yelled I was calling the police. They ran. If they were banging on the door over and over, or ringing the doorbell repeatedly, I would definitely get scared. People act like 911 comes right away, if they even answer at all.
But you shouldn’t open the door to shoot them. If you truly are in fear of your life, you grab your gun but keep the doors shut and locked, then shoot if they come in.
I don’t have much sympathy for someone who goes outside and then claims they shot in self defense. Someone’s at my door, I grab my kids, call the police, lock ourselves in the bathroom, and shoot only if they try to come into the bathroom after I’ve shouted I’m armed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where does it say in the article that he was shot in the back? I didn’t read that in there anywhere.
The actual facts, more of which are probably not in the short article, are what matter. In Virginia you can shot someone if you think your life is in imminent danger. If a group of male teens are banging on my door, on my porch, trespassing on my property, and not leaving right away, what else do I think theyre there to do but break in.
I had teens at 4am come into my fenced in yard, wander around, high out of their mind. My bedroom is in the front of the house, they woke me up, I looked out the window, opened the window and yelled I was calling the police. They ran. If they were banging on the door over and over, or ringing the doorbell repeatedly, I would definitely get scared. People act like 911 comes right away, if they even answer at all.
But you shouldn’t open the door to shoot them. If you truly are in fear of your life, you grab your gun but keep the doors shut and locked, then shoot if they come in.
I don’t have much sympathy for someone who goes outside and then claims they shot in self defense. Someone’s at my door, I grab my kids, call the police, lock ourselves in the bathroom, and shoot only if they try to come into the bathroom after I’ve shouted I’m armed.
Anonymous wrote:Where does it say in the article that he was shot in the back? I didn’t read that in there anywhere.
The actual facts, more of which are probably not in the short article, are what matter. In Virginia you can shot someone if you think your life is in imminent danger. If a group of male teens are banging on my door, on my porch, trespassing on my property, and not leaving right away, what else do I think theyre there to do but break in.
I had teens at 4am come into my fenced in yard, wander around, high out of their mind. My bedroom is in the front of the house, they woke me up, I looked out the window, opened the window and yelled I was calling the police. They ran. If they were banging on the door over and over, or ringing the doorbell repeatedly, I would definitely get scared. People act like 911 comes right away, if they even answer at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Homeowner was black, teen was white. Allegedly the homeowner thought the teens were trying to break in.
How can they be trying to break in if they are ringing the door bell? That’s… not what breaking in is…
Anonymous wrote:They rang the doorbell and got shot? wtf???
Anonymous wrote:Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Homeowner was black, teen was white. Allegedly the homeowner thought the teens were trying to break in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spotsylvania has had racial problems in the past. The SO is very much a gold old boys network.
The fact the homeowner is in jail still is kinda mind blowing.
You shoot someone in the back, you go to jail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Homeowner was black, teen was white. Allegedly the homeowner thought the teens were trying to break in.
Which is not a wild assumption at 3am. But.. you can't shoot someone in the back either, as that's not self defense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spotsylvania has had racial problems in the past. The SO is very much a gold old boys network.
The fact the homeowner is in jail still is kinda mind blowing.
I don’t see this as a racial issue at all. I’m white. The homeowner here is morally right and I hope the law agrees. If someone is lurking around my home banging on doors or windows at 3am they probably won’t like what’s coming to them either. I don’t care about their skin color.
Anonymous wrote:Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Homeowner was black, teen was white. Allegedly the homeowner thought the teens were trying to break in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spotsylvania has had racial problems in the past. The SO is very much a gold old boys network.
The fact the homeowner is in jail still is kinda mind blowing.
I don’t see this as a racial issue at all. I’m white. The homeowner here is morally right and I hope the law agrees. If someone is lurking around my home banging on doors or windows at 3am they probably won’t like what’s coming to them either. I don’t care about their skin color.
No, he is not. He is morally (and legally) in the wrong. The homeowner in DC was debatable. This one is not.