Anonymous wrote:I think they’re going to need to start listening to parents a lot more, otherwise families will continue to leave public schools. What it means in practice is that school districts should probably be a lot smaller and separated according to beliefs because in large districts you get all types and some group is always unhappy. In particular, they need to do more to keep white conservatives happy because it’s obvious to everyone that when white people leave the schools, the schools get worse for everyone who stays.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. We are the forced consumers (in an area where there are no school vouchers, like MCPS) and payers via our exorbitant property and piggyback taxes.
Yes indeed.
Or give me my cost-per-pupil $$ and I will vote with my feet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There should also be opportunities for community involvement — not just parent involvement. My /our taxes pay for the public schools. I /we do this because we want to be a part of an educated community, and value child and family focused services. Having a small segment of the community end up with a disproportionate influence is not appropriate for public education. I like the idea of having smaller districts, but I could see that easily increasing the differences in resources available to many schools and their students and communities.
I think school board elections cover that, though? I know our district also allows non-parent residents to speak at meetings and their input seems taken into consideration equally with that of current parents. That being said, our board shrugs off most feedback altogether unless it comes in the form of a large public petition (which definitely includes residents who don’t have kids) or massive email or phone campaign of some sort.
Yes the SB mostly ignores parents. A big part of this is that the county is too damn large.
This. I prefer the model in some other parts of the country where each town has its own school - and where incorporating a town or city has not been banned state-wide by the legislature for 50+ years. Those smaller school districts spend less per-pupil on overhead and more on actual instruction. Further, the leadership can be held accountable for results and for basic things like using actual paper textbooks.
McLean mom wants a rich school for her own kids and a poor school for brown kids. Tale as old as time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There should also be opportunities for community involvement — not just parent involvement. My /our taxes pay for the public schools. I /we do this because we want to be a part of an educated community, and value child and family focused services. Having a small segment of the community end up with a disproportionate influence is not appropriate for public education. I like the idea of having smaller districts, but I could see that easily increasing the differences in resources available to many schools and their students and communities.
I think school board elections cover that, though? I know our district also allows non-parent residents to speak at meetings and their input seems taken into consideration equally with that of current parents. That being said, our board shrugs off most feedback altogether unless it comes in the form of a large public petition (which definitely includes residents who don’t have kids) or massive email or phone campaign of some sort.
Yes the SB mostly ignores parents. A big part of this is that the county is too damn large.
This. I prefer the model in some other parts of the country where each town has its own school - and where incorporating a town or city has not been banned state-wide by the legislature for 50+ years. Those smaller school districts spend less per-pupil on overhead and more on actual instruction. Further, the leadership can be held accountable for results and for basic things like using actual paper textbooks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There should also be opportunities for community involvement — not just parent involvement. My /our taxes pay for the public schools. I /we do this because we want to be a part of an educated community, and value child and family focused services. Having a small segment of the community end up with a disproportionate influence is not appropriate for public education. I like the idea of having smaller districts, but I could see that easily increasing the differences in resources available to many schools and their students and communities.
I think school board elections cover that, though? I know our district also allows non-parent residents to speak at meetings and their input seems taken into consideration equally with that of current parents. That being said, our board shrugs off most feedback altogether unless it comes in the form of a large public petition (which definitely includes residents who don’t have kids) or massive email or phone campaign of some sort.
Yes the SB mostly ignores parents. A big part of this is that the county is too damn large.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes they should. The best way would be smaller school districts to make them more responsive to parents. Since that is not happening, more use of actual surveys (real ones designed to get input not the fake ones designed to check a box) where you need to put in your kid’s student ID to reply and the system only allows one reply per student number.
The “moron” parents are not the majority even if sometimes they are the loudest.
School districts would not help. Having classes taught in different learning styles would.