Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in OOS last year. The fact that it is an avg school for in state kids and only really competitive for OOS kids was a turn off. Kid turned it down.
Mine didn't get in but was accepted OOS to UVA (attending).
UNC is a great school (from what I hear), but I wondered about attending a school where you're likely more qualified than most of your in-state peers due to their policy of favoring in-state applicants.
Did you not have the same concerns regarding UVA? Your theory makes zero sense re UNC but not UVA.
NP: the difference is UVA also is required to take in state kids BUT those kids are very high stat kids.
Anonymous wrote:Kind of like University of Tennessee: not too difficult to get accepted from in state, but brutally competitive for OOSers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in OOS last year. The fact that it is an avg school for in state kids and only really competitive for OOS kids was a turn off. Kid turned it down.
Mine didn't get in but was accepted OOS to UVA (attending).
UNC is a great school (from what I hear), but I wondered about attending a school where you're likely more qualified than most of your in-state peers due to their policy of favoring in-state applicants.
Yes, that was my kid's concern. I'm not saying the NC applicant pool is bad...I'm saying that this concerned my kid whether it would be very obvious that most of the admitted students were admitted based on far lower stats. It was that concern that made the school unappealing.
Do you think the same thing about UT Austin? And you are saying exactly that the NC applicant pool is bad. what else could you be saying???
This topic was already hashed out in a thread, like last week. I am sure the same Chapel Hill basher/ NC snob will post about NC kids being dumb and that the 18% state mandated cap means that the freshman class is dumbed down by the in state kids, with ZERO data to back up that claim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in OOS last year. The fact that it is an avg school for in state kids and only really competitive for OOS kids was a turn off. Kid turned it down.
Mine didn't get in but was accepted OOS to UVA (attending).
UNC is a great school (from what I hear), but I wondered about attending a school where you're likely more qualified than most of your in-state peers due to their policy of favoring in-state applicants.
Did you not have the same concerns regarding UVA? Your theory makes zero sense re UNC but not UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of like University of Tennessee: not too difficult to get accepted from in state, but brutally competitive for OOSers.
Absolutely not true, not sure why UNC is so misunderstood. It is a very tough admit for Research Triangle and Charlotte students. Many more than qualified will not get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NC is SO overblown, they are great students. Not all UVA or UofM kids are the tippy top either as of course they have to accept kids from all over their states too. I think UNC takes it more as it’s only one state of the 3 that has a top private.
JHU is absolutely a top private.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NC is SO overblown, they are great students. Not all UVA or UofM kids are the tippy top either as of course they have to accept kids from all over their states too. I think UNC takes it more as it’s only one state of the 3 that has a top private.
JHU is absolutely a top private.
Anonymous wrote:The NC is SO overblown, they are great students. Not all UVA or UofM kids are the tippy top either as of course they have to accept kids from all over their states too. I think UNC takes it more as it’s only one state of the 3 that has a top private.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in OOS last year. The fact that it is an avg school for in state kids and only really competitive for OOS kids was a turn off. Kid turned it down.
Mine didn't get in but was accepted OOS to UVA (attending).
UNC is a great school (from what I hear), but I wondered about attending a school where you're likely more qualified than most of your in-state peers due to their policy of favoring in-state applicants.
Anonymous wrote:Kind of like University of Tennessee: not too difficult to get accepted from in state, but brutally competitive for OOSers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got in OOS last year. The fact that it is an avg school for in state kids and only really competitive for OOS kids was a turn off. Kid turned it down.
Mine didn't get in but was accepted OOS to UVA (attending).
UNC is a great school (from what I hear), but I wondered about attending a school where you're likely more qualified than most of your in-state peers due to their policy of favoring in-state applicants.
Yes, that was my kid's concern. I'm not saying the NC applicant pool is bad...I'm saying that this concerned my kid whether it would be very obvious that most of the admitted students were admitted based on far lower stats. It was that concern that made the school unappealing.
Anonymous wrote:The NC is SO overblown, they are great students. Not all UVA or UofM kids are the tippy top either as of course they have to accept kids from all over their states too. I think UNC takes it more as it’s only one state of the 3 that has a top private.
Anonymous wrote:They get beat by Duke a lot
Anonymous wrote:Kind of like University of Tennessee: not too difficult to get accepted from in state, but brutally competitive for OOSers.