Anonymous wrote:Actually, I agree that animals aren’t for human entertainment. But drinking cow milk is more cruel.

Do you own a dog or cat?

For anyone who says soy is dangerous, I urge you to question the “scientists” that deny climate change as well.

The facts are there: most of the continent of Asia has consumed soy for millennia with great health benefits, to the exact contrary of the claim.

There’s an entire industry selling factory farming and its abuse as natural. It’s not. And it’s worse for your health.

Anonymous wrote:Raw milk is nonsense. We could have drunk it, got it freshly milked from a cow every morning. Yet, grandma boiled it, bcs she was not stupid.

A lot of these MAHA people would be dead within a year if they actually time traveled back to the past that they worship.

Raw milk is nonsense. We could have drunk it, got it freshly milked from a cow every morning. Yet, grandma boiled it, bcs she was not stupid.

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

What makes you think anyone is checking the safety of those?

Anonymous wrote:Whatev. I can’t keep up with all the different stuff I’m supposed to be either boycotting, or supporting, or be scared of. It’s exhausting. I’m just gonna focus on my family and doing stuff that makes us happy. Including milk now, apparently.

Go for it. Republicans want everyone to make their own decisions without oversight, so enjoy spinning that wheel of fate as you enjoy your cow milk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw milk: 0–2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3–17 deaths since 2000.

Now do it with deaths per 1000 people or 1000 glasses or something like that. Since the numbers of people willing to risk drinking raw milk is extremely small vs the (hundreds of ?) millions who regularly drink pasteurized milk, just reporting numbers of deaths known or assumed to be related to pasteurized vs raw milk like that is deliberately deceptive.

+1! MAHA is not the brightest.

Anonymous wrote:Great time to switch to soy. It’s actually very healthy and great tasting if you buy the unsweetened version.

The way cows are separated from their calfs for our milk obsession breaks my heart. That milk is for them, not for us!

Whatev. I can’t keep up with all the different stuff I’m supposed to be either boycotting, or supporting, or be scared of. It’s exhausting. I’m just gonna focus on my family and doing stuff that makes us happy. Including milk now, apparently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

How are they healthier?

Less fat
And the knowledge no baby cows were taken from their mothers who were impregnated just to produce it.

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

How are they healthier?

I'm changing from Fairlife (pasteurized and ultra-filtered) to Lactaid (ultra-pasteurized) for our lactose-intolerant household. 10 more cals per serving but better to be safe. The nut milks we use are already ultra-pasteurized.

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

Yuck. Soy milk is terrible for you. Cows milk is best EXCEPT not under Trump Administration

Actually, I agree that animals aren’t for human entertainment. But drinking cow milk is more cruel.

Anonymous wrote:Great time to switch to soy. It’s actually very healthy and great tasting if you buy the unsweetened version.

The way cows are separated from their calfs for our milk obsession breaks my heart. That milk is for them, not for us!

Biologically sure, but in the grand scheme who has the final say on the bolded?

Next up: nobody should ride horses/donkeys because their ability to run is for them, not us!