Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
I can sympathize with both sides. However, the US education system has a known tendency to worship at the altar of technology and then find out it didn't help (or worse, hurt) learning.
Kids are goofing off on Chromebooks like mad. My high schooler is telling me that during the school day he is seeing my elementary school nephew goofing off (during the school day, in a better school district 10 miles away). Hmmm.
In general when kids are bored, I try to take it up as a larger issue with the admin/curriculum developing authorities.
I also sometimes try to identify a more constructive thing a kid can do without disturbing anyone. Free reading and Duolingo come to mind.
It is also true that some kids are bored because they aren't doing the assigned work.
--fellow parent
Which is easier to hide on a Chromebook than on paper.
PP. I have found that detracking was at the root of a lot of the issues. Unchallenged kids get up to mischief when given work that is below their capabilities. They also are mixed with kids who are openly disruptive, which is enabling. Chromebooks pour gasoline on the whole mess. It's not just Chromebooks either. Math ed tech programs and allowing phone use in class (for snapping pics and uploading assignments) are also issues.
Nothing to do with who is being challenged or around other disruptive kids. Get over yourself. Getting into trouble premeditatedly or by accident is a temptation and a challenge to most kids. It's the adults who are dumb
I'm telling you what I know is going on. Kids are are silently misbehaving on the Internet without consequences. Because they see kids getting away even with "loud" disruptions.
In my school district, detracking is absolutely an issue in student motivation.
Elementary ed tech is often used to park groups of students while they wait for the teacher to provide appropriate direct instruction for their level. Even if it's adaptive tech, it's usually used more as a babysitter, not a teacher.
BTW, I don't have the benefit of living in an affluent DMV school district. We are in a "good" middle-class school district in flyover country. From what I read on here, DMV's best school districts have the same problems as my school district but many more strong average students and advanced students. Maybe your root causes are different but the behavior of goofing off on Chromebooks is the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
I can sympathize with both sides. However, the US education system has a known tendency to worship at the altar of technology and then find out it didn't help (or worse, hurt) learning.
Kids are goofing off on Chromebooks like mad. My high schooler is telling me that during the school day he is seeing my elementary school nephew goofing off (during the school day, in a better school district 10 miles away). Hmmm.
In general when kids are bored, I try to take it up as a larger issue with the admin/curriculum developing authorities.
I also sometimes try to identify a more constructive thing a kid can do without disturbing anyone. Free reading and Duolingo come to mind.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to those responses that commiserated or were helpful. I really appreciated the advice to have him make specific amends - I may use that. Right now we haven taken away all screens indefinitely, but I also really liked the advice that if we don't hear anything from the school in X amount of weeks/months, he may be able to earn it back.
I am grateful so many parents understood/related. To those whose kids don't struggle with this, or the teachers weighing in saying this is abnormal, remember all kids have different strengths and weaknesses and their brains develop at different rates. Some children will not struggle with unfettered access to the internet during instruction, but many will. A child's brain is not close to fully developed at 12. I am trying to meet my child where he is developmentally and help guide him to make better choices. I really appreciate the thoughtful advice as I try to navigate this with him.
Last note - yes, I am starting to think he needs out of this school. I have heard from other parents that this is a common issue, and this school seems to be one of the worst when it comes to complete reliance on chromebooks.
Anonymous wrote:we learn about digital citizenship together as a family and he demonstrates a full understanding of what it means)
Anonymous wrote:Wtf you talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have had this trouble too. The school gives him a Chromebook and nothing else to do and then acts shocked the tenth time he does something thoughtless and dumb (never mean or threatening). He doesn’t misuse screens at home so I feel powerless where the school won’t do what I know works (limiting screens; keeping him engaged in other things).
Can’t wait for summer. No real ideas, just commiseration.
As a teacher, I will tell you that most students do not do thoughtless and dumb things when presented with a Chromebook. Limiting screens at home is not having the effect you think it is having. If you raise a child in a home with only health foods, they will gorge on sugar the first time they encounter it. The child needs to learn judgment and impulse control.
Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have had this trouble too. The school gives him a Chromebook and nothing else to do and then acts shocked the tenth time he does something thoughtless and dumb (never mean or threatening). He doesn’t misuse screens at home so I feel powerless where the school won’t do what I know works (limiting screens; keeping him engaged in other things).
Can’t wait for summer. No real ideas, just commiseration.
As a teacher, I will tell you that most students do not do thoughtless and dumb things when presented with a Chromebook. Limiting screens at home is not having the effect you think it is having. If you raise a child in a home with only health foods, they will gorge on sugar the first time they encounter it. The child needs to learn judgment and impulse control.
We are seriously screen limited at home. My kids' teachers never complained about their computer usage. They did come home with stories about stupid stuff other people did on their school issued laptops though.
There are other ways to learn both judgement and impulse control than unlimited temptation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
I can sympathize with both sides. However, the US education system has a known tendency to worship at the altar of technology and then find out it didn't help (or worse, hurt) learning.
Kids are goofing off on Chromebooks like mad. My high schooler is telling me that during the school day he is seeing my elementary school nephew goofing off (during the school day, in a better school district 10 miles away). Hmmm.
In general when kids are bored, I try to take it up as a larger issue with the admin/curriculum developing authorities.
I also sometimes try to identify a more constructive thing a kid can do without disturbing anyone. Free reading and Duolingo come to mind.
It is also true that some kids are bored because they aren't doing the assigned work.
--fellow parent
Which is easier to hide on a Chromebook than on paper.
PP. I have found that detracking was at the root of a lot of the issues. Unchallenged kids get up to mischief when given work that is below their capabilities. They also are mixed with kids who are openly disruptive, which is enabling. Chromebooks pour gasoline on the whole mess. It's not just Chromebooks either. Math ed tech programs and allowing phone use in class (for snapping pics and uploading assignments) are also issues.
Nothing to do with who is being challenged or around other disruptive kids. Get over yourself. Getting into trouble premeditatedly or by accident is a temptation and a challenge to most kids. It's the adults who are dumb
I'm telling you what I know is going on. Kids are are silently misbehaving on the Internet without consequences. Because they see kids getting away even with "loud" disruptions.
In my school district, detracking is absolutely an issue in student motivation.
Elementary ed tech is often used to park groups of students while they wait for the teacher to provide appropriate direct instruction for their level. Even if it's adaptive tech, it's usually used more as a babysitter, not a teacher.
BTW, I don't have the benefit of living in an affluent DMV school district. We are in a "good" middle-class school district in flyover country. From what I read on here, DMV's best school districts have the same problems as my school district but many more strong average students and advanced students. Maybe your root causes are different but the behavior of goofing off on Chromebooks is the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
I can sympathize with both sides. However, the US education system has a known tendency to worship at the altar of technology and then find out it didn't help (or worse, hurt) learning.
Kids are goofing off on Chromebooks like mad. My high schooler is telling me that during the school day he is seeing my elementary school nephew goofing off (during the school day, in a better school district 10 miles away). Hmmm.
In general when kids are bored, I try to take it up as a larger issue with the admin/curriculum developing authorities.
I also sometimes try to identify a more constructive thing a kid can do without disturbing anyone. Free reading and Duolingo come to mind.
It is also true that some kids are bored because they aren't doing the assigned work.
--fellow parent
Which is easier to hide on a Chromebook than on paper.
PP. I have found that detracking was at the root of a lot of the issues. Unchallenged kids get up to mischief when given work that is below their capabilities. They also are mixed with kids who are openly disruptive, which is enabling. Chromebooks pour gasoline on the whole mess. It's not just Chromebooks either. Math ed tech programs and allowing phone use in class (for snapping pics and uploading assignments) are also issues.
Nothing to do with who is being challenged or around other disruptive kids. Get over yourself. Getting into trouble premeditatedly or by accident is a temptation and a challenge to most kids. It's the adults who are dumb
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is what I am hearing.
Teachers: your child is misbehaving and not following directions.
Parents: they can’t help themselves. Why are you letting them use a computer?
Teachers: using a computer is part of the curriculum. Your child needs to follow directions.
Parents: at home we never have this problem
Teachers: home is not school. At school we follow directions and learn according to a curriculum.
I can sympathize with both sides. However, the US education system has a known tendency to worship at the altar of technology and then find out it didn't help (or worse, hurt) learning.
Kids are goofing off on Chromebooks like mad. My high schooler is telling me that during the school day he is seeing my elementary school nephew goofing off (during the school day, in a better school district 10 miles away). Hmmm.
In general when kids are bored, I try to take it up as a larger issue with the admin/curriculum developing authorities.
I also sometimes try to identify a more constructive thing a kid can do without disturbing anyone. Free reading and Duolingo come to mind.
It is also true that some kids are bored because they aren't doing the assigned work.
--fellow parent
Which is easier to hide on a Chromebook than on paper.
PP. I have found that detracking was at the root of a lot of the issues. Unchallenged kids get up to mischief when given work that is below their capabilities. They also are mixed with kids who are openly disruptive, which is enabling. Chromebooks pour gasoline on the whole mess. It's not just Chromebooks either. Math ed tech programs and allowing phone use in class (for snapping pics and uploading assignments) are also issues.