Anonymous wrote:Kamala already became the first female president, albeit briefly.

Anonymous wrote:-100000 points.

The fact that you think AOC "threatens male ego" automatically makes me NOT to want to vote for her and her deranged voter base.

You are going to make the Dems lose again worse than Hilary and Kamala combined.

Do Dems ever want to hold office again before the year 2080?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and don’t care what the first women president looks like, her race, her nationality or her sexual orientation. I also would never vote for a person simply because she’s a woman. That’s insulting.

99% of Americans agree with you.

FALSE. WaPo found that 25%+ Dems rate higher on the hostile sexism scale than the average American.

Also, in an earlier study, researchers found that men politicians were always picked over women and the rate of party switching when a woman was running was high from voters in each party. Republicans were also less favorable toward their woman candidate — Dole.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/11/women-candidates-must-overcome-sexist-attitudes-even-democratic-primary/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15544770802092576

Few people still have this dinosaur mindset. By 2028, after 12 years of the Trump/Biden nightmare, everyone I know will be thrilled to support fit leadership and we don't care what that person looks like or any other irrelevant characteristic they may have. If you have sexist bigots in your network, grab them by the shirt collar and tell them to get their effing act together!

Your stubborn thinking will hold us back. If you want more convincing look up sexism by proxy and Warren. That’s how we got into the Biden mess. Also, check out the thread about 2028 candidates and the number of women saying only a white man will win >> sexism by proxy.

I don't care what Biden or Warren wants anyone to think. I care about what I think and those around me think. We are convinced a woman can and should be POTUS sooner than later. Who in your inner circle is telling you a woman can't or shouldn't be POTUS? Smack them!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and don’t care what the first women president looks like, her race, her nationality or her sexual orientation. I also would never vote for a person simply because she’s a woman. That’s insulting.

99% of Americans agree with you.

FALSE. WaPo found that 25%+ Dems rate higher on the hostile sexism scale than the average American.

Also, in an earlier study, researchers found that men politicians were always picked over women and the rate of party switching when a woman was running was high from voters in each party. Republicans were also less favorable toward their woman candidate — Dole.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/11/women-candidates-must-overcome-sexist-attitudes-even-democratic-primary/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15544770802092576

Few people still have this dinosaur mindset. By 2028, after 12 years of the Trump/Biden nightmare, everyone I know will be thrilled to support fit leadership and we don't care what that person looks like or any other irrelevant characteristic they may have. If you have sexist bigots in your network, grab them by the shirt collar and tell them to get their effing act together!

Your stubborn thinking will hold us back. If you want more convincing look up sexism by proxy and Warren. That’s how we got into the Biden mess. Also, check out the thread about 2028 candidates and the number of women saying only a white man will win >> sexism by proxy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and don’t care what the first women president looks like, her race, her nationality or her sexual orientation. I also would never vote for a person simply because she’s a woman. That’s insulting.

99% of Americans agree with you.

FALSE. WaPo found that 25%+ Dems rate higher on the hostile sexism scale than the average American.

Also, in an earlier study, researchers found that men politicians were always picked over women and the rate of party switching when a woman was running was high from voters in each party. Republicans were also less favorable toward their woman candidate — Dole.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/11/women-candidates-must-overcome-sexist-attitudes-even-democratic-primary/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15544770802092576

Few people still have this dinosaur mindset. By 2028, after 12 years of the Trump/Biden nightmare, everyone I know will be thrilled to support fit leadership and we don't care what that person looks like or any other irrelevant characteristic they may have. If you have sexist bigots in your network, grab them by the shirt collar and tell them to get their effing act together!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and don’t care what the first women president looks like, her race, her nationality or her sexual orientation. I also would never vote for a person simply because she’s a woman. That’s insulting.

99% of Americans agree with you.

FALSE. WaPo found that 25%+ Dems rate higher on the hostile sexism scale than the average American.

Also, in an earlier study, researchers found that men politicians were always picked over women and the rate of party switching when a woman was running was high from voters in each party. Republicans were also less favorable toward their woman candidate — Dole.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/11/women-candidates-must-overcome-sexist-attitudes-even-democratic-primary/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15544770802092576

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a woman and don’t care what the first women president looks like, her race, her nationality or her sexual orientation. I also would never vote for a person simply because she’s a woman. That’s insulting.

99% of Americans agree with you.

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Dem, left of left of center, as in the Bernie and AOC wing of the progressive Democrats. And still, I'm coming to terms with this take on American culture: The first woman president will be a Republican.

I personally would vote for AOC or any of the younger Democrats being talked about now. But she won't win. If America votes for a woman, it will be a woman who does not threaten the male ego. She will be conservative but code moderate, simply by being softspoken and having gentle mannerisms. She will be attractive, probably white, probably of a slender build, and definitely a mother. Most likely of a WASP or northern European background.

I used to think Kristi Noem fit the bill until she bragged about shooting a dog. But generally she will fit the profile of a Mama Grizzly conservative, "tough" only in the pro-America red-blooded right wing kind of way, stroking the alpha male aesthetic ego. She won't be a pantsuit girlboss. She would win independents and moderate Democrats only because so much of this country is ill-informed about politics in that a woman - a softspoken woman, not someone outwardly crazy like MTG or Lauren Boebert - would "code moderate" just because she's a woman.

The first woman president will be nonthreatening and pleasing to the male gaze, and she will be subservient to a white male VP. But the GOP will get to claim the historic milestone of the first woman president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next president will be a boring white guy, slightly younger than our most recent ones.

I don't think so. Our country will be in shambles in 4 years. It will be someone who can restore trust and rebuild our systems.

So basically all we need is any POTUS similar to what we had between Washington and Obama. That's all we want and need. Normal, adequate leadership.

Many of those presidents would be terrible today. We live on their shoulders, we don’t need to go back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next president will be a boring white guy, slightly younger than our most recent ones.

I don't think so. Our country will be in shambles in 4 years. It will be someone who can restore trust and rebuild our systems.

So basically all we need is any POTUS similar to what we had between Washington and Obama. That's all we want and need. Normal, adequate leadership.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unlike the others, AOC is playing up her hotness. She even released that video, with media claiming conservatives were objecting to her dancing.

Recently? I feel like she’s been playing it down in the last year or so.