Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they lost my goodwill forever when all the incriminating data came to light during the SFFA trial.
Same. Harvard isn’t what it was.
Neither is America. People standing by as Trump destroys what took years to build. History in the making.
Yes it took years to build the advanced grift system to scam Americans taxpayers and that gravy train is gone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they lost my goodwill forever when all the incriminating data came to light during the SFFA trial.
Same. Harvard isn’t what it was.
Neither is America. People standing by as Trump destroys what took years to build. History in the making.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go woke, go broke, when you have deep pockets it just takes longer to get there.
It's still Harvard.
Not that you'd get in
It’s still garbage.
Not that anyone cares if you’d get in.
![]()
Sure Harvard is "garbage"
Harvard hasn't given a hoot about undergraduate education since the 1960s. And now their undergrads don't care, either: https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2024/03/university-people-the-undergraduate-balance
"One casualty of these easy A’s has been the amount of reading students do. I kept hearing from professors in my interviews that students don’t do as many readings as they used to. Russian studies professor Terry Martin told me that “Reading seems to have fallen in status or as a normative academic task.”
Indeed, three of my friends and I took a high-level seminar one semester, and, although we knew hundreds of pages of readings would be assigned each week, we were excited about the prospect of engaging with the material. As time went on, the percentage of readings each of us did went from nearly 100 to nearly 0.
In the final class, each student was asked to cite their favorite readings, and the professor was surprised that so many chose readings from the first few units. That wasn’t because the students happened to be most interested in those classes’ material; rather, that was the brief period of the course when everyone actually did some of the readings.
Despite having barely engaged with the course material, we all received A’s."
Anonymous wrote:Curoius how others in this position are navigating these uncertain times....
Anonymous wrote:An institution has to REALLY love antisemitism & discrimination in order to turn down $2 billion so they can continue them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:harvard is one of a few schools that has the money to be able to do this. That’s nice and all but not that impressive, and not fair to compare to other schools with lesser funds who may be forced to capitulate in order to stay solvent.
It’s automatically impressive since no one else has done it.
Hillsdale and Grove City beg to differ.
Anonymous wrote:An institution has to REALLY love antisemitism & discrimination in order to turn down $2 billion so they can continue them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a pretty uninvolved alum, I sent them a large donation yesterday and will I be going out of my way to hire Harvard alums. n of 1 here but I do think there will be an energized H network in the coming years.
Interesting, bc my harvard alum friends say the opposite, they have ceased donations and look elsewhere for hiring. But harvard has a global brand, deep pockets and a strong international donor base, so time will tell.
Anonymous wrote:An institution has to REALLY love antisemitism & discrimination in order to turn down $2 billion so they can continue them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a pretty uninvolved alum, I sent them a large donation yesterday and will I be going out of my way to hire Harvard alums. n of 1 here but I do think there will be an energized H network in the coming years.
Interesting, bc my harvard alum friends say the opposite, they have ceased donations and look elsewhere for hiring. But harvard has a global brand, deep pockets and a strong international donor base, so time will tell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:harvard is one of a few schools that has the money to be able to do this. That’s nice and all but not that impressive, and not fair to compare to other schools with lesser funds who may be forced to capitulate in order to stay solvent.
It’s automatically impressive since no one else has done it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go woke, go broke, when you have deep pockets it just takes longer to get there.
It's still Harvard.
Not that you'd get in
It’s still garbage.
Not that anyone cares if you’d get in.
![]()
Sure Harvard is "garbage"