Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a person can recognize giftedness without being gifted. That being said, I don’t think the committee is nailing it on understanding giftedness. Advanced academics, sure. Giftedness? No. But I’m not going to blame it on the teachers.
“Giftedness” is irrelevant. A school’s job is to provide an academic education. They are screening for kids capable of advanced academics. Whatever other needs they may have due to their giftedness (for those that truly are gifted), isn’t the school’s wheelhouse. That’s on the parents.
Virginia law mandates programs for gifted education. Also, gifted education falls under the special education umbrella. The whole program is flawed, but it is mandated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and I’m gifted 🤷♀️
Most aren't. There's data on this. Most people in general aren't gifted, nor do they need to be in order to do a good job teaching.
I will say, though, I know a lot of teachers both family members and old college friends. The one friend who became a gifted teacher... was gifted.
Anonymous wrote:+1 It is a very flawed system with lots of subjectivity. Moreover, the program isn’t even that great! You can do far superior things with your child.Anonymous wrote:OMG—the utter stupidity of the OP’s post. I’m embarrassed for them.
You do realize that the admissions team at a medical school is not made up of doctors. Same for law schools.
Also, no one is determining if someone is gifted or not. Teachers are completing a HOPE scale are answering questions based on observations. It’s the same as when they’re asked to complete a behavior rating scale for ADHD. They’re not diagnosing ADHD—they’re simply answering questions based on their observation in a particular setting. A professional does the diagnosis based on the scores reported.
Teachers who are on a central screening committee review multiple data points for eligibility into a program. No one is diagnosing anyone or making a determination that this student is gifted and that student isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a person can recognize giftedness without being gifted. That being said, I don’t think the committee is nailing it on understanding giftedness. Advanced academics, sure. Giftedness? No. But I’m not going to blame it on the teachers.
“Giftedness” is irrelevant. A school’s job is to provide an academic education. They are screening for kids capable of advanced academics. Whatever other needs they may have due to their giftedness (for those that truly are gifted), isn’t the school’s wheelhouse. That’s on the parents.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve read a lot of dumb things online but this really takes the cake.
Anonymous wrote:OMG—the utter stupidity of the OP’s post. I’m embarrassed for them.
You do realize that the admissions team at a medical school is not made up of doctors. Same for law schools.
Also, no one is determining if someone is gifted or not. Teachers are completing a HOPE scale are answering questions based on observations. It’s the same as when they’re asked to complete a behavior rating scale for ADHD. They’re not diagnosing ADHD—they’re simply answering questions based on their observation in a particular setting. A professional does the diagnosis based on the scores reported.
Teachers who are on a central screening committee review multiple data points for eligibility into a program. No one is diagnosing anyone or making a determination that this student is gifted and that student isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:I think a person can recognize giftedness without being gifted. That being said, I don’t think the committee is nailing it on understanding giftedness. Advanced academics, sure. Giftedness? No. But I’m not going to blame it on the teachers.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve read a lot of dumb things online but this really takes the cake.
+1 It is a very flawed system with lots of subjectivity. Moreover, the program isn’t even that great! You can do far superior things with your child.Anonymous wrote:OMG—the utter stupidity of the OP’s post. I’m embarrassed for them.
You do realize that the admissions team at a medical school is not made up of doctors. Same for law schools.
Also, no one is determining if someone is gifted or not. Teachers are completing a HOPE scale are answering questions based on observations. It’s the same as when they’re asked to complete a behavior rating scale for ADHD. They’re not diagnosing ADHD—they’re simply answering questions based on their observation in a particular setting. A professional does the diagnosis based on the scores reported.
Teachers who are on a central screening committee review multiple data points for eligibility into a program. No one is diagnosing anyone or making a determination that this student is gifted and that student isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and I’m gifted 🤷♀️
Most aren't. There's data on this. Most people in general aren't gifted, nor do they need to be in order to do a good job teaching.
I will say, though, I know a lot of teachers both family members and old college friends. The one friend who became a gifted teacher... was gifted.
Share the data? Not sure how they could collect that info.
-Another teacher here with a 155 IQ
Anonymous wrote:I’ve read a lot of dumb things online but this really takes the cake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and I’m gifted 🤷♀️
Most aren't. There's data on this. Most people in general aren't gifted, nor do they need to be in order to do a good job teaching.
I will say, though, I know a lot of teachers both family members and old college friends. The one friend who became a gifted teacher... was gifted.
Share the data? Not sure how they could collect that info.
-Another teacher here with a 155 IQ
Anonymous wrote:https://giftedissues.davidsongifted.org/bb/ubbthreads.php/topics/120474/master-of-none.html
Does anyone else find it annoying that teachers with lower IQs than the students they are evaluating are determining if these students are gifted???? The committee who prepares and evaluates AAP Packets should be made up of gifted individuals who have high enough IQs themselves to qualify for AAP. Most of the students I graduated with who ended up being teachers did not do well in high school and went to schools like Radford. How are they somehow able to determine how gifted a child is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a teacher and I’m gifted 🤷♀️
Most aren't. There's data on this. Most people in general aren't gifted, nor do they need to be in order to do a good job teaching.
I will say, though, I know a lot of teachers both family members and old college friends. The one friend who became a gifted teacher... was gifted.