Anonymous
04/06/2025 18:12
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?
Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple
Great! Show us the efforts to invalidate votes in Republican victories.
You mean like trying to get Trump off the presidential ballot in three states?
Sorry, no tears for you.
The constitution is pretty clear about people who fomented sedition not be eligible for the ballot.
And the NC law is clear in this case.
How it'll be applied in this situation is not. The Election Commission and trial court ruled one way. The COA, by a 2-1 vote, ruled another.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 17:09
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?
Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple
Great! Show us the efforts to invalidate votes in Republican victories.
You mean like trying to get Trump off the presidential ballot in three states?
Sorry, no tears for you.
The constitution is pretty clear about people who fomented sedition not be eligible for the ballot.
And the NC law is clear in this case.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 16:58
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Every legal voter whose vote is discarded has the right to take up arms against the tyrants who are trying to overthrow democracy. No taxation without represent.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 15:20
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?
Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple
Great! Show us the efforts to invalidate votes in Republican victories.
You mean like trying to get Trump off the presidential ballot in three states?
Sorry, no tears for you.
The constitution is pretty clear about people who fomented sedition not be eligible for the ballot.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 15:05
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?
Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple
Great! Show us the efforts to invalidate votes in Republican victories.
You mean like trying to get Trump off the presidential ballot in three states?
Sorry, no tears for you.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 14:56
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
It’s pretty appalling. I went and checked the story about the candidate’s own parents being targeted because it seemed so ridiculous, but it’s true!
It seems a lot of people think there is something sketchy about all of these disputed votes. The fact that Griffin’s people targeted voters likely to have voted against him makes it something more than that. The fact that Riggs’s own parents were targeted is really insidious.
It seems a lot of people think there is something sketchy about all of these disputed votes. The fact that Griffin’s people targeted voters likely to have voted against him makes it something more than that. The fact that Riggs’s own parents were targeted is really insidious.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 14:49
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:These people are just anti-freedom to their core. Republican judges did a favor for the Republican who lost the race and a recount. Third mulligan for the Republican?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/north-carolina-judges-open-door-tossing-60000-ballots-high-court-race-2025-04-04/
the headline should include...to steal an election
Anonymous
04/06/2025 14:24
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
thegriffinlist.com is amazing; you can look up names by county or check addresses by map.
It also contains some of the most amazing testimonials.
I checked on the few relatives I have in NC; might ask my sister to post something on Nextdoor in case the two nearby neighbors are interested in curing their ballots and trying to save this sorry situation.
It also contains some of the most amazing testimonials.
I checked on the few relatives I have in NC; might ask my sister to post something on Nextdoor in case the two nearby neighbors are interested in curing their ballots and trying to save this sorry situation.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 14:21
Subject: Re:NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
The only election results which are being challenged for this election is this one. And yes, if these votes are thrown out it will impact other races. Why are these other people not contesting their races? They aren’t because this is a made up problem. The GOP is desperate to maintain control of the NC Supreme Court as they don’t want their gerrymandering to be upset. There’s a lot at stake.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 14:17
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you think there is fraud in NC voting then you don’t live in NC and you haven’t voted. We lived in VA and moved to NC a couple of years ago. NC has an elaborate process you go through when you vote to prevent fraud.
This is all an attempt to overturn an election which Allison Riggs won. It’s sour grapes.
Hey, we were told Virginia, Maryland, and other states have an elaborate process you go through when you vote to prevent fraud. Now you are saying this applies to North Carolina and not Virginia?
Voting in NC follows a different process. You are twisting my words.
NC requires extra steps I have no idea if it’s better, but it’s more involved. You have to sign a paper validating you are who you say you are and the track the number of your ballot with this document. It adds time to voting. Happy now?
Anonymous
04/06/2025 13:28
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Correction: He did go across the state but focused on voters who were more likely to vote Dem, not everyone who had the registration issue. That's why everyone thinks he'd win if they get tossed AND why maybe he wouldn't if people now update their registration.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 12:47
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
The candidate challenging specifically complained about areas where the Dem won by high margins. If this truly were a legit issue, they'd seek this for the entire state.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 12:43
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.
Agree completely.
First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.
Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.
This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?
To be clear: why is it “fraud” when Republicans lose elections? Or are you suggesting that all votes without these numbers be thrown out from all elections including those where Republicans won?
Yes, even where Republicans won. It’s a law from 2004. Why are you ok with fraud? If the votes are not legal, they’re not legal. Seems simple
Great! Show us the efforts to invalidate votes in Republican victories.
Anonymous
04/06/2025 12:39
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:If you think there is fraud in NC voting then you don’t live in NC and you haven’t voted. We lived in VA and moved to NC a couple of years ago. NC has an elaborate process you go through when you vote to prevent fraud.
This is all an attempt to overturn an election which Allison Riggs won. It’s sour grapes.
Hey, we were told Virginia, Maryland, and other states have an elaborate process you go through when you vote to prevent fraud. Now you are saying this applies to North Carolina and not Virginia?
Anonymous
04/06/2025 10:02
Subject: NC Republicans are on the verge of canceling 65000 votes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The voters already validated their identity when they registered to vote; there is no reason they need to revalidate every single time they vote.
Be careful what you wish for. When I lived in the Middle East, I was prohibited from purchasing an iPhone, for which I planned to pay cash and therefore did not require credit or anything, at one of the main TCOM providers because my signature did not EXACTLY match the signature on my passport and other IDs. In reality, they did not want to give me the phone because I was a woman and my husband was not with me when I attempted to make the purchase.
What are you going to do when they deny your voter registration because your signature does not exactly match?
Matching signatures becomes are real issue especially as people age.
It's also an issue when using electronic signature pads vs pen and paper. We used to live and vote in Florida. Registration was done on a paper form and we presented ID.
A few months later there was an election. I presented my FL driver's license then they required me to give a signature on an electronic pad, something VA does not do. My first attempt was rejected. I took a deep breath, thought about my name and realized I'd signed with middle initial and my guess was my registration had full name signed. So I very carefully spelled out my full name and it was accepted.
For some other elections I voted by mail and the signature line on the envelope was across the seal, causing the pen to skip as it hit that spot. Always made me concerned my ballot would be rejected for my signature.
There are plenty of ways to reject legimate ballots from legitimately registered US citizen voters.