Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How exploitive. She has plenty of kids and doesn't need a surrogate for more.

Talk to Chrissy Teagan, Hilaria Baldwin, and Kim Kardashian then…it’s none of your effing business.

In Chrissy Tiger's defense (never thought I'd say those words), she had multiple miscarriages and a stillborn and didn't think she could give live birth again.

Chrissy and her surrogate overlapped in their pregnancies - but Chrissy was pregnant for 5 months before her surrogate even got pregnant. That’s the height of exploitation. Who needs another baby while already pregnant?

🥒

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How exploitive. She has plenty of kids and doesn't need a surrogate for more.

Talk to Chrissy Teagan, Hilaria Baldwin, and Kim Kardashian then…it’s none of your effing business.

In Chrissy Tiger's defense (never thought I'd say those words), she had multiple miscarriages and a stillborn and didn't think she could give live birth again.

Chrissy and her surrogate overlapped in their pregnancies - but Chrissy was pregnant for 5 months before her surrogate even got pregnant. That’s the height of exploitation. Who needs another baby while already pregnant?

+1 Chrissy is way more exploitative. Leave Michelle alone!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess she wants a big family. Hate to sound crass but will she continue to use surrogacy to pump out children? Why put another woman’s life at risk to have more kids when you’ve already had two so recently…

You make it sound like the woman (surrogate) has no free will.

Destitute people may be more inclined to do things like this just to survive. Some people don’t want government support.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How exploitive. She has plenty of kids and doesn't need a surrogate for more.

Talk to Chrissy Teagan, Hilaria Baldwin, and Kim Kardashian then…it’s none of your effing business.

In Chrissy Tiger's defense (never thought I'd say those words), she had multiple miscarriages and a stillborn and didn't think she could give live birth again.

Chrissy and her surrogate overlapped in their pregnancies - but Chrissy was pregnant for 5 months before her surrogate even got pregnant. That’s the height of exploitation. Who needs another baby while already pregnant?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How exploitive. She has plenty of kids and doesn't need a surrogate for more.

Talk to Chrissy Teagan, Hilaria Baldwin, and Kim Kardashian then…it’s none of your effing business.

In Chrissy Tiger's defense (never thought I'd say those words), she had multiple miscarriages and a stillborn and didn't think she could give live birth again.

And yet she was pregnant with Esti even before her surrogate got pregnant. Interesting. And you don’t think that is exploitive?! She was already carrying a baby but decided she absolutely had to have that 4th by surrogate - while she was still pregnant. You have no idea whether Michelle had some miscarriages along the way or maybe she have severe pre eclampsia and was advised not to carry again.