Anonymous wrote:Could you change it to “I recognize your frustration”?
Anonymous wrote:I work with someone who drops articles and conjunctions in both written and verbal communication. Is this a new thing?
For examples:
I’m curious your thoughts.
Authors of study suggest people…
Anonymous wrote:DP, but appreciate the insights. Not to hijack the thread, but different grammar question.
Would you say “give the books to me and John” or “John and me”? I feel like the latter was more appropriate when I was younger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, there's no hard and fast rule. Sometimes it's required, sometimes it's optional. Context matters.
In your example, it's optional, but I would keep it in.
If you are editing something with a group, it's probably in a work context, so I'd err on the side of being more formal and leaving it in.
Detailed explanation here: https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/articles/when-to-delete-that/
Understood.
Fwiw, I’ve been listening to people debate this so much that I can’t decide where I land on the matter.
Honestly, the inclusion of “that” when it’s optional rather than required almost seems less formal/less polished when reading aloud. It sounds more technical than refined.
NP. Including “that” is completely fine. I honestly want to know what you do for a living where multiple people are sitting around wringing their hands about this issue.
Anonymous wrote:Are the people you are arguing with lawyers? I find they want to unnecessarily insert "that" everywhere. I fight this battle daily.
The overall trend in style is to delete it when not absolutely necessary.
Anonymous wrote:DP, but appreciate the insights. Not to hijack the thread, but different grammar question.
Would you say “give the books to me and John” or “John and me”? I feel like the latter was more appropriate when I was younger.