Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question we should ask is why shouldn't we want Greenland to be part of US. Why should it be under Denmark, a small nordic country very far away from Greenland that do not have the resources to keep it well. Why should it not be part of US?
lol…because it’s not ours. How about we come over and build a garage in your yard? You weren’t using it, anyway.
Have we fallen so far that the MAGAs have forgotten lessons learned in kindergarten? Maybe they didn’t make it that far in school.
Yes, I also want my neighbors house and cars. But, I can’t just demand it take them. It’s pretty simple.
If I really, really wanted them, I could communicate that to them directly including the details and conditions of that transfer. I’d get arrested if I went to their house and demanded or used a show of power or violence.
There are rules that govern these things. That’s why many people are upset about countries invading other countries!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question we should ask is why shouldn't we want Greenland to be part of US. Why should it be under Denmark, a small nordic country very far away from Greenland that do not have the resources to keep it well. Why should it not be part of US?
Why shouldn’t Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova be part of Russia? Why shouldn’t Azerbaijan be part of Armenia? Why shouldn’t Palestine, Lebanon and Syria give up chunks of their land to Israel? Maybe we can give Alaska to Russia so they’ll calm down.
Anonymous wrote:Can Denmark do anything if China invades Greenland?
Anonymous wrote:It just part of the flood zone technique to say ridiculous things to get the opposition distracted by nonsense. It’s nothing.
Anonymous wrote:The question we should ask is why shouldn't we want Greenland to be part of US. Why should it be under Denmark, a small nordic country very far away from Greenland that do not have the resources to keep it well. Why should it not be part of US?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of. I think it's a better way to increase the number of Americans than through silly Visa's.
Personally, I would prefer to see a balancing of our states in terms of sizes. EG bust up California and Texas. Amalgamate those small east coast states like Rhode Island and Delaware.
Generally, we need to get away from these political borders that were drawn by European governors who didn't even have a decent map. Maryland-Delaware makes no sense. Why do we still have Lord Calvert's coat of arms as a flag. Talk about the person that started the once a slave always a slave convention. Wow, and liberals whine about Jefferson, but no Lord Calvert's statue in Baltimore is no worse for the BLM ire.
Yo, don't mess with Maryland my Maryland. It's one of the only cool state flags in the country hon.
I don't get it. If you're going to be proud of a flag, why that one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's comments about annexing these two countries are widely opposed and ridiculed around the world. Trump voters, do you support this? Did you know this was part of what you voted for?
Playing devil's advocate here, not supporting anyone politically.
I think Greenland is supported in a wide bipartisan way.
What's not to like about expanding US territory? It would be good for Greenland also. Win win.
Now Canada, no way, not many people want to make it a territory much less a state. That won't happen or have any support, and was more of a meme joke.
It's not though: https://www.livenowfox.com/news/new-polls-little-support-us-takeover-canada-greenland-gaza Very few Americans want the US to take over Greenland.
The poll you referenced says 51% support Greenland annexation, 49% against. Also most native Greenlanders 60% roughly, support annexation as a territory.
Canada is a net loss and a money pit country at this point.
Gaza is just HELL NO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's comments about annexing these two countries are widely opposed and ridiculed around the world. Trump voters, do you support this? Did you know this was part of what you voted for?
Playing devil's advocate here, not supporting anyone politically.
I think Greenland is supported in a wide bipartisan way.
What's not to like about expanding US territory? It would be good for Greenland also. Win win.
Now Canada, no way, not many people want to make it a territory much less a state. That won't happen or have any support, and was more of a meme joke.
It's not though: https://www.livenowfox.com/news/new-polls-little-support-us-takeover-canada-greenland-gaza Very few Americans want the US to take over Greenland.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question we should ask is why shouldn't we want Greenland to be part of US. Why should it be under Denmark, a small nordic country very far away from Greenland that do not have the resources to keep it well. Why should it not be part of US?
lol…because it’s not ours. How about we come over and build a garage in your yard? You weren’t using it, anyway.
Have we fallen so far that the MAGAs have forgotten lessons learned in kindergarten? Maybe they didn’t make it that far in school.
Anonymous wrote:The question we should ask is why shouldn't we want Greenland to be part of US. Why should it be under Denmark, a small nordic country very far away from Greenland that do not have the resources to keep it well. Why should it not be part of US?