Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they live in $2M homes in DC (based on their names in the interview and Zillow)
If it is so important for your child to attend K - cut a check.
Lol I love that they opened themselves up to criticism like this.
I don't live in NW DC but it's amazing how some people over there in upper Caucasia have absolutely no clue what is happening in the rest of the city.
White people -- and I will bet all my money that you're white -- who think "Upper Caucasia" is anywhere close to clever always amuse me. It maybe was clever 20 years ago when people first started saying it. Now you just seem lame and jealous. Get new material.
What is the race of the families complaining?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they live in $2M homes in DC (based on their names in the interview and Zillow)
If it is so important for your child to attend K - cut a check.
Lol I love that they opened themselves up to criticism like this.
I don't live in NW DC but it's amazing how some people over there in upper Caucasia have absolutely no clue what is happening in the rest of the city.
White people -- and I will bet all my money that you're white -- who think "Upper Caucasia" is anywhere close to clever always amuse me. It maybe was clever 20 years ago when people first started saying it. Now you just seem lame and jealous. Get new material.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, enroll those 3 kids in K TODAY in their in boundary school.
If there really is a developmental reason for them to repeat K, the professionals still have time to collect data and make the correct educational decisions.
Parents dont get to unilaterally make educational decisions in public schools (thank goodness).
Anonymous wrote:I also have a dd with a late August birthday. She started when she was supposed to and was the second youngest in the grade. One thing I noticed was that the prek and K curriculums were aimed more at her level than the older kids. It seemed that the kids with early October birthdays sometimes seemed bored or uninterested it what the “younger” kids were doing. That leveled out by the end of K and the rest of elementary there were no real differences. It helps that my dd is tall for her age so there’s no physical difference between her and kids 11 months older.
She now in middle school and there were some bumps in early 6th as her executive functioning and maturity were lagging a bit. But we helped her work through that and she’s doing well now.
I guess my point is that as parents, we want what’s best for our kids but we can’t micromanage their lives and experiences to the extent that we want to. All we can do is help them find the tools to manage whatever situation they are in.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, enroll those 3 kids in K TODAY in their in boundary school.
If there really is a developmental reason for them to repeat K, the professionals still have time to collect data and make the correct educational decisions.
Parents dont get to unilaterally make educational decisions in public schools (thank goodness).
Anonymous wrote:I get that "grey area" can't be a law-- but I do think principles should have a right to review redshirts on a case by case bases -- example -- say you just moved in from a different state that had a sept 1 cut off (since most do) -- is DC really going to make said child skip a grade because they were born sept 2nd? OR say you have a child born on September 30th and you can already tell they aren't developmental ready for K (or to be with kids almost an entire year older then then). What I don't agree with is parents just thinking they can do whatever they want... especially when their kids birthday is in May/June/July....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the previous principal allowed parents to do it at Lafayette so all the preschools told their parents it was fine? In many cases two kids in the same family? If they were going to change longstanding school policy they should have given people a years heads up at a minimum.
Also the law says to go to first grade to you have to be six on the first day of school and that’s in direct conflict with the cutoff for anyone born in September.
do you have a cite for that?
Not even sure how a new principal would know that private preschools were telling parents that their kids would be allowed to redshirt. Surely it's easier for the parents to identify the new principal (especially if they already had kids enrolled there) than for the new principal to identify the parents who thought they would be allowed to break the rules?
The mom who keeps posting that parents "should have been TOLD" is so deeply entitled. It's so informative about the kind of parent at Lafayette . "We should be allowed to break the rules whenever we want, and if we aren't we should somehow be proactively identified, out of a community of hundreds and hundreds of parents, and told way in advance. Being told onc we try to break the rules is offensive and WRONG."
If what she now wishes she did was enroll her kid in PK4 at Lafayette rather than private school for the 2024-5 school year, she would have had to enter the lottery in early 2024. I don't think Principal Prall had even been hired by then. So who would have told her, and when?
If I'm thinking about the dates right, she couldn't have enrolled her kid at Lafayette for PK4 at Lafayette for the 2024-25 school year -- that's when her kid should have been enrolled in kindergarten under DC law. Incidentally, her kid had a kindergarten spot by right (assuming in bound) and wouldn't have had to lottery.
Anonymous wrote:I get that "grey area" can't be a law-- but I do think principles should have a right to review redshirts on a case by case bases -- example -- say you just moved in from a different state that had a sept 1 cut off (since most do) -- is DC really going to make said child skip a grade because they were born sept 2nd? OR say you have a child born on September 30th and you can already tell they aren't developmental ready for K (or to be with kids almost an entire year older then then). What I don't agree with is parents just thinking they can do whatever they want... especially when their kids birthday is in May/June/July....