Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never shopped at Target, but I love Amazon and I'm keeping my Prime membership. Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't the problem, here. (Don't use Facebook or any Meta product).
They are absolutely part of the problem.
PP you replied to. No, they're really not. You need to look past the Bezos and Zuckerberg million dollar donations to the Inauguration and see what the war of influence is between Musk and those guys. I don't know what you've got against Target, I never shop there.
NP — Bezos is killing off the Washington Post as a great newspaper, he is absolutely part of the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never shopped at Target, but I love Amazon and I'm keeping my Prime membership. Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't the problem, here. (Don't use Facebook or any Meta product).
They are absolutely part of the problem.
PP you replied to. No, they're really not. You need to look past the Bezos and Zuckerberg million dollar donations to the Inauguration and see what the war of influence is between Musk and those guys. I don't know what you've got against Target, I never shop there.
Look past the fact that they are part of the problem?
No thanks.
Fck Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg.
Bezos doesn't run Amazon or its sub companies. He runs the post, movie, etc. Bezos stock from Amazon but so do employees and many others. Amazon provides a lot of jobs so you are hurting those working for amazon at risk for losing their jobs as numbers go down.
Musk ... not a chance I'd buy anything from him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never shopped at Target, but I love Amazon and I'm keeping my Prime membership. Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't the problem, here. (Don't use Facebook or any Meta product).
They are absolutely part of the problem.
PP you replied to. No, they're really not. You need to look past the Bezos and Zuckerberg million dollar donations to the Inauguration and see what the war of influence is between Musk and those guys. I don't know what you've got against Target, I never shop there.
Anonymous wrote:I'd love a good replacement for kids stuff - specifically basic clothes, not the kind I would get as hand-me-downs. For example, socks, underwear, leggings. Where you shop for these?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Walmart?
I boycotted them from the start. They moved into smalltown rural areas, offered low prices, put the local stores out of business, and raised their prices.
So, no, I won't shop there.
When has Walmart raised prices? Their net profit margin is under 3%!
Anonymous wrote:This list makes it easier to find places to replace the billionaire-owned companies.
The suggestions for replacing the Washington Post were good. They might not all be perfect though. I questioned Wayfair as a replacement for Amazon, but this list is a start.
https://www.boycottoligarchs.com/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't proactively support small businesses even if I like the notion of small businesses because they're just not that great. They are more expensive and don't have the same stock. And some are certainly very ideological (looking at you Penzys).
Amazon is wonderful. Target is convenient. The only person who cares if you try to make a moral argument out of avoiding Amazon and Target is you and you alone, no one else. Do what you want but you aren't budging the needle except you will spend more money by trying to avoid the big boxes and Amazon, and it was another person on another thread who also pointed out it's more ecologically friendly and sustainable to stick with Amazon and deliveries than going to 20 different stores in your car.
I would not listen to this Debbie Downer.
Tesla boycotts worked well enough that Musky had Trump doing car advertisements on the White House lawn, had Hannity posting he bought a Tesla, and had his friend "donate" Teslas to the Las Vegas police department (which I think doesn't want to drive them??).
So, yes, boycotts work.
I'll keep going.
Just like how Musk bankrupted twitter? Wait, hold on.
Most people can't afford Teslas. I don't care about Tesla. But thinking you're going to change your fantasy of whatever the big bad owners of Target or Amazon are doing by not patronizing their businesses isThey are in business because they are super efficient and deliver enormous bang for the buck and that's all that matters. Virtue signaling protests isn't going to do anything but play out in your fantasies. Like a lot of these posts on DCUM.
Yup. I predict Tesla will kick Musk out and Target will declare bankruptcy. Let’s see if the felon likes bulldogs like he likes cars that you can’t charge at government buildings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Walmart?
I boycotted them from the start. They moved into smalltown rural areas, offered low prices, put the local stores out of business, and raised their prices.
So, no, I won't shop there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't proactively support small businesses even if I like the notion of small businesses because they're just not that great. They are more expensive and don't have the same stock. And some are certainly very ideological (looking at you Penzys).
Amazon is wonderful. Target is convenient. The only person who cares if you try to make a moral argument out of avoiding Amazon and Target is you and you alone, no one else. Do what you want but you aren't budging the needle except you will spend more money by trying to avoid the big boxes and Amazon, and it was another person on another thread who also pointed out it's more ecologically friendly and sustainable to stick with Amazon and deliveries than going to 20 different stores in your car.
I would not listen to this Debbie Downer.
Tesla boycotts worked well enough that Musky had Trump doing car advertisements on the White House lawn, had Hannity posting he bought a Tesla, and had his friend "donate" Teslas to the Las Vegas police department (which I think doesn't want to drive them??).
So, yes, boycotts work.
I'll keep going.
Anonymous wrote:I don't proactively support small businesses even if I like the notion of small businesses because they're just not that great. They are more expensive and don't have the same stock. And some are certainly very ideological (looking at you Penzys).
Amazon is wonderful. Target is convenient. The only person who cares if you try to make a moral argument out of avoiding Amazon and Target is you and you alone, no one else. Do what you want but you aren't budging the needle except you will spend more money by trying to avoid the big boxes and Amazon, and it was another person on another thread who also pointed out it's more ecologically friendly and sustainable to stick with Amazon and deliveries than going to 20 different stores in your car.
Anonymous wrote:Walmart?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never shopped at Target, but I love Amazon and I'm keeping my Prime membership. Bezos and Zuckerberg aren't the problem, here. (Don't use Facebook or any Meta product).
They are absolutely part of the problem.
PP you replied to. No, they're really not. You need to look past the Bezos and Zuckerberg million dollar donations to the Inauguration and see what the war of influence is between Musk and those guys. I don't know what you've got against Target, I never shop there.
Look past the fact that they are part of the problem?
No thanks.
Fck Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg.