Anonymous wrote:He’s gross, end of story.
Anonymous wrote:I looked at her other work. She's basically photo-realistic although she also says she tries to capture the person's spirit and keep her own thoughts out of the way. A lot of her work looks stiff and frankly much like portraits I've seen in other state houses, which are not art, they are just pictures of people.
It was the Colorado Senate Republicans who unveiled the portrait in 2019.
The picture in his post is blurry, Denver Post has a front on photo of the actual portrait. Honestly, it looks like him except without the glaring orange, and he looks serious. I wonder what his own body image is and I wonder if a painting doesn't feed back to that image as a mirror would.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It never fails to astound me how vain but also insecure the Radical Extreme Right president is. This whole house of cards rests on his fragile ego, which must be tended to like a delicate seedling.
Very few would have seen the picture until he shared it.
Anonymous wrote:He should be thanking her. He looks way worse in real life.
Anonymous wrote:The only important fact to be gleaned from this kerfuffle is that our “president” is choosing to spend his time on crap like this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a great likeness. I wouldn't say he looks obese, it's flattering in that respect, it just doesn't look like him. It looks like a regular statesman, which he is not.
It looks like a high school art student's best work-- not like a portrait by an accomplished artist. Either it was intentional, or the artist isn't very good.
It's actually quite flattering. His hair is tough to work with, and it looks like she did the best she could with that travesty of nature. She gave him a healthy skin tone instead of his favored orange clown makeup. He should be complimenting her.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s make this the official portrait!