Anonymous
03/24/2025 17:34
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Which we tried to warn Republicans about, but they didn't care. Women and babies are expendable.
yep. They actually had to witness a woman they know dying or becoming infertile. Disgusting.
And there are going to be a lot more women becoming infertile or dying because of these laws.
And a lot of women will decide having kids just isn't worth it unless they can leave Texas.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 17:08
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
I'm almost positive that was sarcasm. and I hope I'm right.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Those babies and mothers were killed by the all-merciful all-loving God. Those are good deaths.
You don't get for speak for the dead woman
Typical R
Anonymous
03/24/2025 17:07
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
And how do you know this? What facts support your tens of thousands?
tele-evangilist...or some guy with a beer gut and podcast
Anonymous
03/24/2025 14:59
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Huh, who'd have thought that killing off and maiming their members so badly that they can't birth more kids (future GOP members as well), would be a bad strategy?!
Anonymous
03/24/2025 14:56
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Those babies and mothers were killed by the all-merciful all-loving God. Those are good deaths.
You don't get for speak for the dead woman
Typical R
Anonymous
03/24/2025 14:45
Subject: Re:Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Congrats MAGAs.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 14:42
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Those babies and mothers were killed by the all-merciful all-loving God. Those are good deaths.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 14:40
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
We can have nuance on abortion and fetal development as a continuum, as without it we'd be banning IVF and keeping fertilized embryos alive indefinitely just because, which is ridiculous.
We don't have laws that force women to donate organs even when it would save their dying child, and so, we also should not have laws that force women to donate their body to sustain another life for 9 months.
And we certainly should NOT have laws that cause doctors to have to pause and consider lawyer input before proceeding to save a life which is how it is in TX and some other states right now. Curious how their exceptions will apply to situations such as a woman who is medically stable, but is diagnosed with cancer. Do we force her to wait for the cancer to spread before we allow abortion? Can't do chemo in the 1st trimester. I'm sure the PP believes the only answer is for a woman to sacrifice her own life as a dutiful sacrificial lamb though.
IVF and surrogacy should be banned. Surrogacy because it is exploiting other women's body, often poor women and putting their health at risk. We are guaranteed the PURSUIT of happiness not actual happiness.
Also, carpentry and boilermaking should be banned. They are exploiting mens bodies.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 13:51
Subject: Re:Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
https://www.propublica.org/article/texas-abortion-ban-sepsis-maternal-mortality-analysis#:~:text=In%202021%2C%2067%20patients%20who,and%20likely%20missed%20some%20cases.
Sepsis rates in Texas soar after abortion was banned.
Sepsis rates in Texas soar after abortion was banned.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 13:46
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
We can have nuance on abortion and fetal development as a continuum, as without it we'd be banning IVF and keeping fertilized embryos alive indefinitely just because, which is ridiculous.
We don't have laws that force women to donate organs even when it would save their dying child, and so, we also should not have laws that force women to donate their body to sustain another life for 9 months.
And we certainly should NOT have laws that cause doctors to have to pause and consider lawyer input before proceeding to save a life which is how it is in TX and some other states right now. Curious how their exceptions will apply to situations such as a woman who is medically stable, but is diagnosed with cancer. Do we force her to wait for the cancer to spread before we allow abortion? Can't do chemo in the 1st trimester. I'm sure the PP believes the only answer is for a woman to sacrifice her own life as a dutiful sacrificial lamb though.
IVF and surrogacy should be banned. Surrogacy because it is exploiting other women's body, often poor women and putting their health at risk. We are guaranteed the PURSUIT of happiness not actual happiness.
I didn't comment on surrogacy, but to ban IVF would be voting against the will of the people. IVF allows people to pursue happiness (and frankly, so does abortion), so your last sentence is frankly, useless.
I am adopted and still believe in a woman's right to choose. If you wanted to get into banning IVF, you would get into banning any contraception that has the ability to ever work as an abortifacient, in which case, you are insane and do not represent the "will" of most US citizens..
Lastly, the majority of people in the US do not have such extreme beliefs. If we believe in freedom and democracy, rather than government imposing rules on us to our own detriment, then our representatives should be LISTENING to the people and voting for reasonable abortion laws rather than the insanity that exists in some red states.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 13:31
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Which we tried to warn Republicans about, but they didn't care. Women and babies are expendable.
yep. They actually had to witness a woman they know dying or becoming infertile. Disgusting.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 12:55
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Which we tried to warn Republicans about, but they didn't care. Women and babies are expendable.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 12:53
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Jfc you are dumb
DP. Like it or not, for some people, this means something.
It is a meaningless statement without proof. The fact that the infant mortality rate in TX has risen, not fallen, does not bode well for PP's ability to back that up. The data shows that this law has actually killed more babies and mothers.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 12:48
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
We can have nuance on abortion and fetal development as a continuum, as without it we'd be banning IVF and keeping fertilized embryos alive indefinitely just because, which is ridiculous.
We don't have laws that force women to donate organs even when it would save their dying child, and so, we also should not have laws that force women to donate their body to sustain another life for 9 months.
And we certainly should NOT have laws that cause doctors to have to pause and consider lawyer input before proceeding to save a life which is how it is in TX and some other states right now. Curious how their exceptions will apply to situations such as a woman who is medically stable, but is diagnosed with cancer. Do we force her to wait for the cancer to spread before we allow abortion? Can't do chemo in the 1st trimester. I'm sure the PP believes the only answer is for a woman to sacrifice her own life as a dutiful sacrificial lamb though.
IVF and surrogacy should be banned. Surrogacy because it is exploiting other women's body, often poor women and putting their health at risk. We are guaranteed the PURSUIT of happiness not actual happiness.
Anonymous
03/24/2025 12:43
Subject: Texas Republicans starting to regret killing and maiming pregnant women
Anonymous wrote:Tens of thousands of babies are alive who would not be without these bills.
Is even one of those babies worth one woman having a miscarriage as dying because doctors are prohibited from helping her. I guess you think leaving other children without their mother is a good out one. You disgust me