Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title should be Go Away Bernie, Go Away AOC
Need more centrist leaders in the party to get it back. Going far left with these fools will alienate even more voters and Dems will lose even worse next election.
I'll bite. What SPECIFICALLY AND EXACTLY that you think they are saying is "too far left" and "alienating"?
Provide recent, specific and relevant citations.
Deliver, or screw off. I mean, seriously.
AOC has vocally supported federal protections for gender-affirming care, calling for its inclusion in any universal healthcare plan during a December 2024 livestream, while condemning state bans on transgender youth healthcare as "cruel and unscientific." Sanders, in a January 2025 Senate speech, backed expanding Medicare to cover all gender-affirming treatments, framing it as a matter of equity and bodily autonomy. Also both have tied racial justice to their economic agenda. In November 2024, AOC endorsed the "Breathe Act", pushing to defund police and redirect resources to Black communities for mental health and housing, while Sanders, at a March 2025 Las Vegas rally, called for ending cash bail and decriminalizing nonviolent offenses to address systemic racism, explicitly linking these reforms to dismantling "oppressive structures" impacting Black lives. Their rhetoric and policy proposals reflect a far-left stance prioritizing systemic upheaval over moderation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Wake up!! Identity politics is not the issue. It’s finding a candidate who speaks to the people and what they NEED. It doesn’t matter if it’s a woman or man or POC. Stop focusing on identity. Hillary and Kamala lost because they were ultimately boring establishment candidates (despite being female and a POC). Trump was viewed as a change agent.
It appears to be impossible for Democrats not to focus on identity. I agree with you, but I don’t believe the party has the ability to move past identity as the only thing it cares about.
Anonymous wrote:We need to wrestle the means of production from the greedy capitalist hands of the bourgeoise and only AOC & the Bern are capable of leading that fight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Wake up!! Identity politics is not the issue. It’s finding a candidate who speaks to the people and what they NEED. It doesn’t matter if it’s a woman or man or POC. Stop focusing on identity. Hillary and Kamala lost because they were ultimately boring establishment candidates (despite being female and a POC). Trump was viewed as a change agent.
It appears to be impossible for Democrats not to focus on identity. I agree with you, but I don’t believe the party has the ability to move past identity as the only thing it cares about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Wake up!! Identity politics is not the issue. It’s finding a candidate who speaks to the people and what they NEED. It doesn’t matter if it’s a woman or man or POC. Stop focusing on identity. Hillary and Kamala lost because they were ultimately boring establishment candidates (despite being female and a POC). Trump was viewed as a change agent.
It appears to be impossible for Democrats not to focus on identity. I agree with you, but I don’t believe the party has the ability to move past identity as the only thing it cares about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah no. They are good for some things but loosers as leadership.
This IS leadership.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Wake up!! Identity politics is not the issue. It’s finding a candidate who speaks to the people and what they NEED. It doesn’t matter if it’s a woman or man or POC. Stop focusing on identity. Hillary and Kamala lost because they were ultimately boring establishment candidates (despite being female and a POC). Trump was viewed as a change agent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started following their IG accounts and their public events. Looks like some good showing in Nevada and CO. They might be too left winged for some, but at least they are standing up to the craziness of the current administration and situation.
NP. I like the enthusiasm and numbers but man those are some very white and very old audiences.
Well Kamala brought a lot of black voters and that wasn’t enough. No one is going to vote Bernie in, I don’t think, he’s against capitalism. AOC seems very sane and speaks her mind instead of trying to ‘get’ votes. So I would totally vote for her. But I doubt she would win anything.
Democrats are driven by women these days but it seems the larger populace really won’t vote in a woman as president. That’s the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Title should be Go Away Bernie, Go Away AOC
Need more centrist leaders in the party to get it back. Going far left with these fools will alienate even more voters and Dems will lose even worse next election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title should be Go Away Bernie, Go Away AOC
Need more centrist leaders in the party to get it back. Going far left with these fools will alienate even more voters and Dems will lose even worse next election.
I'll bite. What SPECIFICALLY AND EXACTLY that you think they are saying is "too far left" and "alienating"?
Provide recent, specific and relevant citations.
Deliver, or screw off. I mean, seriously.
AOC has vocally supported federal protections for gender-affirming care, calling for its inclusion in any universal healthcare plan during a December 2024 livestream, while condemning state bans on transgender youth healthcare as "cruel and unscientific." Sanders, in a January 2025 Senate speech, backed expanding Medicare to cover all gender-affirming treatments, framing it as a matter of equity and bodily autonomy. Also both have tied racial justice to their economic agenda. In November 2024, AOC endorsed the "Breathe Act", pushing to defund police and redirect resources to Black communities for mental health and housing, while Sanders, at a March 2025 Las Vegas rally, called for ending cash bail and decriminalizing nonviolent offenses to address systemic racism, explicitly linking these reforms to dismantling "oppressive structures" impacting Black lives. Their rhetoric and policy proposals reflect a far-left stance prioritizing systemic upheaval over moderation.
This is the hill you want to die on? I’m more concerned about the cost of living and social security. Gender affirming care is rich people’s problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title should be Go Away Bernie, Go Away AOC
Need more centrist leaders in the party to get it back. Going far left with these fools will alienate even more voters and Dems will lose even worse next election.
I'll bite. What SPECIFICALLY AND EXACTLY that you think they are saying is "too far left" and "alienating"?
Provide recent, specific and relevant citations.
Deliver, or screw off. I mean, seriously.
AOC has vocally supported federal protections for gender-affirming care, calling for its inclusion in any universal healthcare plan during a December 2024 livestream, while condemning state bans on transgender youth healthcare as "cruel and unscientific." Sanders, in a January 2025 Senate speech, backed expanding Medicare to cover all gender-affirming treatments, framing it as a matter of equity and bodily autonomy. Also both have tied racial justice to their economic agenda. In November 2024, AOC endorsed the "Breathe Act", pushing to defund police and redirect resources to Black communities for mental health and housing, while Sanders, at a March 2025 Las Vegas rally, called for ending cash bail and decriminalizing nonviolent offenses to address systemic racism, explicitly linking these reforms to dismantling "oppressive structures" impacting Black lives. Their rhetoric and policy proposals reflect a far-left stance prioritizing systemic upheaval over moderation.
I have no doubt those policies would be great ones for winning the next presidential election! Would be a big hit with mainstream voters! Maybe serve Bud Lite at rallies!