Anonymous wrote:I am the they won't trust you PP. I have ben one of those coworkers stuck filling in for an on leave coworker, no extra pay or consideration given. On top of doing that while the position was empty, then having the new hire gone again...not my idea of an ideal coworker. So we won't be having coffee or lunches but I will do my job and yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not nuts to apply. I’ve successfully done the same and hired a pregnant woman as well. After you receive the offer, let your new supervisor know you are pregnant and ask to discuss how you would be able to manage some maternity leave. You need to be open to a short leave. I only took 8 weeks. I gave my employee 12. Depending on how long the search takes and when they need someone, they could be willing to wait until after you have the baby for you to start as well. All a discussion for after you have the offer. And don’t listen to the poster who said people won’t trust you. That’s nonsense.
I would give you one week maternity leave, if that. Above PP is wrong. You are coming to a job for six to eight weeks and then taking maternity leave for whatever you can finagle and other employees will have to do your job and this does not foster warm feelings for you
And this human hiding behind anonymity is why America is going down the drain. Disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of sexism here!
I hired a woman who looked 45 weeks pregnant at the interview (she was short, skinny, and all belly). After we gave the offer, she negotiated to start when Baby was 12 weeks before accepting.
That baby just went to college and Mom still works with us. She is awesome - good employees know that three months is a blip in a career, and anyone can need that kind of leave at anytime. NBD.
Someone diagnosed with cancer is not someone hiding a pregnancy and screwing a new employer.
The literal point of the anti-discrimination law is because pregnant women are not, in fact, “screwing a new employer”. You’re an actual misogynist.
new poster here
Maternity leave does in fact screw the employer, no matter how much you want to pretend it does not. Employers hire because they need work done. If the employee can't do the work because they are on maternity leave, and the employer can't hire a replacement because they have to save the job for the employee they already hired, how will the work get done?
Either co-workers pick up the slack (which can cause burnout) or hire temps (which is expensive, can be unreliable/not as qualified) or the work just doesn't get done. Explain how this doesn't screw employers?
While some employers might be happy to put up with this for a proven productive employee, I can't blame one for not wanting to start off like this right off the bat with a new one.
Anonymous wrote:
I also interviewed while pregnant but not showing. Once the interviews progressed enough but before an official offer, I let them know I was pregnant. I figured I didn’t want to work somewhere if that was going to be a problem. I got the offer and as part of the negotiation was able to get a few more weeks than their baseline.
I’ve now been on the receiving end a post-offer notice of a pregnancy (with rights to an 6 month leave) and it’s annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of sexism here!
I hired a woman who looked 45 weeks pregnant at the interview (she was short, skinny, and all belly). After we gave the offer, she negotiated to start when Baby was 12 weeks before accepting.
That baby just went to college and Mom still works with us. She is awesome - good employees know that three months is a blip in a career, and anyone can need that kind of leave at anytime. NBD.
Someone diagnosed with cancer is not someone hiding a pregnancy and screwing a new employer.
The literal point of the anti-discrimination law is because pregnant women are not, in fact, “screwing a new employer”. You’re an actual misogynist.
I suspect this anti pregnancy act will be revoked by trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of sexism here!
I hired a woman who looked 45 weeks pregnant at the interview (she was short, skinny, and all belly). After we gave the offer, she negotiated to start when Baby was 12 weeks before accepting.
That baby just went to college and Mom still works with us. She is awesome - good employees know that three months is a blip in a career, and anyone can need that kind of leave at anytime. NBD.
Someone diagnosed with cancer is not someone hiding a pregnancy and screwing a new employer.
The literal point of the anti-discrimination law is because pregnant women are not, in fact, “screwing a new employer”. You’re an actual misogynist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of sexism here!
I hired a woman who looked 45 weeks pregnant at the interview (she was short, skinny, and all belly). After we gave the offer, she negotiated to start when Baby was 12 weeks before accepting.
That baby just went to college and Mom still works with us. She is awesome - good employees know that three months is a blip in a career, and anyone can need that kind of leave at anytime. NBD.
Someone diagnosed with cancer is not someone hiding a pregnancy and screwing a new employer.
The literal point of the anti-discrimination law is because pregnant women are not, in fact, “screwing a new employer”. You’re an actual misogynist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of sexism here!
I hired a woman who looked 45 weeks pregnant at the interview (she was short, skinny, and all belly). After we gave the offer, she negotiated to start when Baby was 12 weeks before accepting.
That baby just went to college and Mom still works with us. She is awesome - good employees know that three months is a blip in a career, and anyone can need that kind of leave at anytime. NBD.
Someone diagnosed with cancer is not someone hiding a pregnancy and screwing a new employer.
Anonymous wrote:I interviewed for a (much wanted) job at 28 weeks pregnant. I'm looking at starting it potentially around 33 weeks. Have not yet disclosed (although now it would be visibly very obvious to anyone). At what point should I disclose? How should I navigate the need for leave? I know many would say I was nuts to even apply, but this was a rare opportunity to go after a job closely aligned with my professional ambitions that I've been working towards for nearly two decades.