Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.

Can you give specific examples of when you’ve noticed that CNN or MSNBC did not cover something or “omitted a ton”?

Good grief.
You only need to go back a few years to the Russian collusion delusion to see how these networks bought the whole narrative hook line and sinker.
Any serious network or publication would have questioned much of the "information" that was being put out there. Instead, they simply went along with the narrative.
And, then there is the Hunter laptop story. These networks pushed the letter by the "51 former intelligence officials" that was false.
Give me a break.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.

Can you give specific examples of when you’ve noticed that CNN or MSNBC did not cover something or “omitted a ton”?

Good grief.
You only need to go back a few years to the Russian collusion delusion to see how these networks bought the whole narrative hook line and sinker.
Any serious network or publication would have questioned much of the "information" that was being put out there. Instead, they simply went along with the narrative.
And, then there is the Hunter laptop story. These networks pushed the letter by the "51 former intelligence officials" that was false.
Give me a break.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.

Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.

This.

This absolutely. OP you can easily do it yourself by checking Fox and other outlet. Recent example: yesterday i opened WSJ.com and first bug news was Musk about to be briefed at the Pentagon on the US’ secret plans on fighting China in a war. Checked CNN.com and nytimes.com and if i remember theguardian.com and the news was there prominently. Checked foxnews.com and could not see it anywhere. That was a pretty big news but fox readers could keep themselves occupied wiht the latest bad photo of AOC or the female teacher in montana accused of molesting a kid

They covered that pretty extensively. That is how I found out about the fake news.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-loses-over-possibility-musk-top-secret-china-briefing-no-business

That's not news, it's an opinion piece that puts all focus on the left's reaction as opposed to putting any attention on the actual story.

And by the way, whenever Trump calls something "fake news," history has shown us that more often than not it means it's TRUE news that Trump just didn't want getting out.

Translation: I was wrong that Fox didn't cover the story so I will divert to insults and ignore the fact that every official has denied a story that was thinly sourced by "anonymous" sources.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.

Can you give specific examples of when you’ve noticed that CNN or MSNBC did not cover something or “omitted a ton”?

Good grief.
You only need to go back a few years to the Russian collusion delusion to see how these networks bought the whole narrative hook line and sinker.
Any serious network or publication would have questioned much of the "information" that was being put out there. Instead, they simply went along with the narrative.
And, then there is the Hunter laptop story. These networks pushed the letter by the "51 former intelligence officials" that was false.
Give me a break.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.

Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.

This.

This absolutely. OP you can easily do it yourself by checking Fox and other outlet. Recent example: yesterday i opened WSJ.com and first bug news was Musk about to be briefed at the Pentagon on the US’ secret plans on fighting China in a war. Checked CNN.com and nytimes.com and if i remember theguardian.com and the news was there prominently. Checked foxnews.com and could not see it anywhere. That was a pretty big news but fox readers could keep themselves occupied wiht the latest bad photo of AOC or the female teacher in montana accused of molesting a kid

They covered that pretty extensively. That is how I found out about the fake news.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-loses-over-possibility-musk-top-secret-china-briefing-no-business

That's not news, it's an opinion piece that puts all focus on the left's reaction as opposed to putting any attention on the actual story.

And by the way, whenever Trump calls something "fake news," history has shown us that more often than not it means it's TRUE news that Trump just didn't want getting out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.

Can you give specific examples of when you’ve noticed that CNN or MSNBC did not cover something or “omitted a ton”?

Anonymous wrote:Can you give me examples of stories that aren’t covered by Fox et al.

This week, or going back

Just where Fox chooses not to cover news stories at all. (Keeping viewers in a bubble)

I’m having a conversation with a family member …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN, MSNBC viewers and WaPo, LATimes, Politico, NYTimes readers think the summer of BLM riots were "mostly peaceful". What's your point?

Because they were. Here is the actual data.
https://acleddata.com/2021/05/25/a-year-of-racial-justice-protests-key-trends-in-demonstrations-supporting-the-blm-movement/

Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.

Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.

This.

This absolutely. OP you can easily do it yourself by checking Fox and other outlet. Recent example: yesterday i opened WSJ.com and first bug news was Musk about to be briefed at the Pentagon on the US’ secret plans on fighting China in a war. Checked CNN.com and nytimes.com and if i remember theguardian.com and the news was there prominently. Checked foxnews.com and could not see it anywhere. That was a pretty big news but fox readers could keep themselves occupied wiht the latest bad photo of AOC or the female teacher in montana accused of molesting a kid

They covered that pretty extensively. That is how I found out about the fake news.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-loses-over-possibility-musk-top-secret-china-briefing-no-business

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.

Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.

This.

This absolutely. OP you can easily do it yourself by checking Fox and other outlet. Recent example: yesterday i opened WSJ.com and first bug news was Musk about to be briefed at the Pentagon on the US’ secret plans on fighting China in a war. Checked CNN.com and nytimes.com and if i remember theguardian.com and the news was there prominently. Checked foxnews.com and could not see it anywhere. That was a pretty big news but fox readers could keep themselves occupied wiht the latest bad photo of AOC or the female teacher in montana accused of molesting a kid

Anonymous wrote:Can you give me examples of stories that aren’t covered by Fox et al.

This week, or going back

Just where Fox chooses not to cover news stories at all. (Keeping viewers in a bubble)

I’m having a conversation with a family member …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.

Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.

This.