There’s a lot of this weird stuff going on. Members of some British punk band were detained and at least one was sent back home. No real explanation was given as far as I can tell.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/21/uk-subs-band-detained-deported

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Come on, how would some CBP yahoo know what is "confidential information" from Los Alamos that the researcher shouldn't have access to? And then not let him INTO the US but send him home instead?

Sorry, but that story makes no sense.

DP. It makes no sense to you. Our intelligence services are actually very good and share information with many world agencies. Plus, ESTA users sign that they can be detained, etc. Don't think you know everything. Many of these yahoos work all the time to protect you.

DP. Other countries Intelligence agencies have stop sharing with the US. You obviously have no knowledge of what is happening with US intelligence. Also this was not US intelligence. It was CBP. You people are idiots. The US is alone in the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Come on, how would some CBP yahoo know what is "confidential information" from Los Alamos that the researcher shouldn't have access to? And then not let him INTO the US but send him home instead?

Sorry, but that story makes no sense.

DP. It makes no sense to you. Our intelligence services are actually very good and share information with many world agencies. Plus, ESTA users sign that they can be detained, etc. Don't think you know everything. Many of these yahoos work all the time to protect you.

So good that they release an international spy from custody, *after* the spy exfiltrates secret information, and returns them to a hostile government?

With protection like that, who needs to be attacked?

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Please use some critical thinking. How did someone entering into the US obtain this confidential information from one of this countries secretive location. He was entering the US, not exiting. Oh and they just let him fly back to France without detaining him for possible espionage. Pam Bondi feed you idiots a nugget and you bite without much thought. DOJ can sell some of you people your own dirty drawers and you would believe they are brand, spanking new. Just sad.

Anonymous wrote:Entry into the U.S. is at the sole discretion of the CBP. If CBP determined that this individual should not be admitted to the U.S. that is the mandate they have and the legal right to do so.

They are not God
There has to be oversight as to how their determinations are made.

We are not currently in wartime

Entry into the U.S. is at the sole discretion of the CBP. If CBP determined that this individual should not be admitted to the U.S. that is the mandate they have and the legal right to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Come on, how would some CBP yahoo know what is "confidential information" from Los Alamos that the researcher shouldn't have access to? And then not let him INTO the US but send him home instead?

Sorry, but that story makes no sense.

DP. It makes no sense to you. Our intelligence services are actually very good and share information with many world agencies. Plus, ESTA users sign that they can be detained, etc. Don't think you know everything. Many of these yahoos work all the time to protect you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is nonsense. They have screening systems and something flagged him.

What source of information do you have for that? Your opinion doesn’t count.

It is not an opinion, and you don't need to know nor do you have a clearance to know.

Anonymous wrote:France has a high population of Islamic activists I bet it was related to terrorism. There are no details in this article about the person or background so this article is quite useless.

Actually there are many articles on this. Google it. IT says that FBI dropped charges because there was no case. Go read and come back to us. People saying they hate trump or disagree with him is not an act of terrorism.....J6 now that was terrorism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Come on, how would some CBP yahoo know what is "confidential information" from Los Alamos that the researcher shouldn't have access to? And then not let him INTO the US but send him home instead?

Sorry, but that story makes no sense.

Obviously something flagged this researcher and he was sent into secondary. This story is just as likely as crazy accounts of critical conversations about Trump.

Anonymous wrote:Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Come on, how would some CBP yahoo know what is "confidential information" from Los Alamos that the researcher shouldn't have access to? And then not let him INTO the US but send him home instead?

Sorry, but that story makes no sense.

Another hysterical narrative bites the dust

The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/20/europe/french-researcher-expelled-trump-intl-latam/index.html

Anonymous wrote:This is nonsense. They have screening systems and something flagged him.

What source of information do you have for that? Your opinion doesn’t count.