Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
Not true. Personally, I would never send a boy to GDS.
Why?
Because he doesn't need a steady diet of how horrible and oppressive he is, simply because he is a male. And because their sports program is embarrassingly weak, across the board. And no one seems to care, which is a problem in and of itself.
This is also our view and why we left in. We are a very progressive family but I don't need my son's school day focused on: "Because he doesn't need a steady diet of how horrible and oppressive he is, simply because he is a male.". This comes from the TOP down and trickles into the entire school. This happens a lot less at Sidwell, and a bit more at Maret.
I do worry about this for my son as well. Any sense at this point of what type of leader they might be seeking to replace Russell?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
If you child likes one more than the other - let them choose.
But as a parent with children at both schools - they are not the same. And it does matter on a variety of dimensions. But how and how much depends on the kid.
Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
Not true. Personally, I would never send a boy to GDS.
Why?
Because he doesn't need a steady diet of how horrible and oppressive he is, simply because he is a male. And because their sports program is embarrassingly weak, across the board. And no one seems to care, which is a problem in and of itself.
This is also our view and why we left in. We are a very progressive family but I don't need my son's school day focused on: "Because he doesn't need a steady diet of how horrible and oppressive he is, simply because he is a male.". This comes from the TOP down and trickles into the entire school. This happens a lot less at Sidwell, and a bit more at Maret.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
Not true. Personally, I would never send a boy to GDS.
Why?
Because he doesn't need a steady diet of how horrible and oppressive he is, simply because he is a male. And because their sports program is embarrassingly weak, across the board. And no one seems to care, which is a problem in and of itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was wondering if folks with experience at either/both schools would like to weigh in.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
GDS
1. Less structured teaching/classroom environment;
2. No high school cafeteria/lunch program;
3. CCO restricts the number of college applications to 12;
4. No AP courses offered, and the AP exam is NOT administered on campus; and
5. Founded as a racially integrated school in 1945 (on the right side of history).
Sidwell
1. More structured/traditional teaching and classroom environment;
2. High school cafeteria (lunch included in tuition cost);
3. CCO does NOT restrict students’ college applications;
4. No AP courses offered, however, the AP exam is administered on campus; and
5. Founded in 1883 and racially segregated until 1956 (NOT on the right side of history).
I would add to this that Sidwell has an open campus and many students go out for lunch. So unless you have clear expectations with your child, you could end up paying for lunch anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no material differences. Let your kid pick. Those who say they are very different are way too immersed in the insular world of the expensive DC private school scene.
It truly does not matter.
Not true. Personally, I would never send a boy to GDS.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was wondering if folks with experience at either/both schools would like to weigh in.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
GDS
1. Less structured teaching/classroom environment;
2. No high school cafeteria/lunch program;
3. CCO restricts the number of college applications to 12;
4. No AP courses offered, and the AP exam is NOT administered on campus; and
5. Founded as a racially integrated school in 1945 (on the right side of history).
Sidwell
1. More structured/traditional teaching and classroom environment;
2. High school cafeteria (lunch included in tuition cost);
3. CCO does NOT restrict students’ college applications;
4. No AP courses offered, however, the AP exam is administered on campus; and
5. Founded in 1883 and racially segregated until 1956 (NOT on the right side of history).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell is not a secular school if that matters to you. They talk about God and they have worship meetings in line with being a Quaker school. That’s at least one big difference.
Good point.
I have not heard that word used once. So you can’t possibly know since you’ve obviously only read about SFS
I said “good point” because they mentioned God during our tour there this fall. I was honestly surprised. I knew it was a Quaker school and that Quakerism is a Christian denomination, but I thought of the School is having Quaker value as well being secular in practice. They didn’t talk about Jesus, but God definitely came up a couple of times. For many people this isn’t a big deal, including us since that’s where my child will be going, but I think it is worth noting for anyone who isn’t expecting it to be at least minimally religious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell is not a secular school if that matters to you. They talk about God and they have worship meetings in line with being a Quaker school. That’s at least one big difference.
Good point.
I have not heard that word used once. So you can’t possibly know since you’ve obviously only read about SFS
Anonymous wrote:DS chose GDS over Sidwell bc he is more focused on the arts. He is an athlete, but knows he is not good enough to play on Sidwell's basketball team. AT GDS, he knew he would get playing time, which was important to him. The sense at GDS is that the admin really lets kids decide for themselves what their strengths are and pretty much will support that choice. At Sidwell, there is more conformity with regard to what is understood as excellence. College outcomes are very similar, though they vary from year to year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was wondering if folks with experience at either/both schools would like to weigh in.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts.
GDS
1. Less structured teaching/classroom environment;
2. No high school cafeteria/lunch program;
3. CCO restricts the number of college applications to 12;
4. No AP courses offered, and the AP exam is NOT administered on campus; and
5. Founded as a racially integrated school in 1945 (on the right side of history).
Sidwell
1. More structured/traditional teaching and classroom environment;
2. High school cafeteria (lunch included in tuition cost);
3. CCO does NOT restrict students’ college applications;
4. No AP courses offered, however, the AP exam is administered on campus; and
5. Founded in 1883 and racially segregated until 1956 (NOT on the right side of history).