Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s best to let things settle down and then get divorced otherwise it’s like trying to get a toddler to put on their shoe. But the tantrum take two years
Who is this advice for? The injured spouse? I don’t see the rush and agree I need to process the hurt my spouse caused me with the betrayal. But he’s in such a rush and thinks we can get this done in a few months. I feel like I’m not ready yet to be rational and will throw a lot of money away on lawyer fees for stuff that’s better worked out in therapy.
He wants to move on with the AP. You don’t see the rush but he does.
If so, she holds the cards. Slow it down. Fire your lawyer for a while/ Having multiple divorce lawyers - That is super common
Exactly. If he wants out quick he’s either got to make an offer I can’t refuse or be willing to take some punches along the way. If he wants something more reasonable he should let his balls cool off while my anger does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s best to let things settle down and then get divorced otherwise it’s like trying to get a toddler to put on their shoe. But the tantrum take two years
Who is this advice for? The injured spouse? I don’t see the rush and agree I need to process the hurt my spouse caused me with the betrayal. But he’s in such a rush and thinks we can get this done in a few months. I feel like I’m not ready yet to be rational and will throw a lot of money away on lawyer fees for stuff that’s better worked out in therapy.
He wants to move on with the AP. You don’t see the rush but he does.
If so, she holds the cards. Slow it down. Fire your lawyer for a while/ Having multiple divorce lawyers - That is super common
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had to reread the thread because I thought I missed something. How could wanting to have college paid for make you a “leach”
Crazy.
She’s salty that there’s less left for her spawn.
Anonymous wrote:Personally, I’m hoping to come to an agreement without going to court, but I want to have everything well that out. In particular, I have medically complex kids and I need to make sure that they are always properly insured. I’m sure there are other things. I need to have a plan for with them, but making sure I get everything right is really getting me wound up. In theory, their father won’t be a jerk about their care, but I am wondering how things will change if and when there’s a new family involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s best to let things settle down and then get divorced otherwise it’s like trying to get a toddler to put on their shoe. But the tantrum take two years
Who is this advice for? The injured spouse? I don’t see the rush and agree I need to process the hurt my spouse caused me with the betrayal. But he’s in such a rush and thinks we can get this done in a few months. I feel like I’m not ready yet to be rational and will throw a lot of money away on lawyer fees for stuff that’s better worked out in therapy.
He wants to move on with the AP. You don’t see the rush but he does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s best to let things settle down and then get divorced otherwise it’s like trying to get a toddler to put on their shoe. But the tantrum take two years
Who is this advice for? The injured spouse? I don’t see the rush and agree I need to process the hurt my spouse caused me with the betrayal. But he’s in such a rush and thinks we can get this done in a few months. I feel like I’m not ready yet to be rational and will throw a lot of money away on lawyer fees for stuff that’s better worked out in therapy.
Anonymous wrote:It’s best to let things settle down and then get divorced otherwise it’s like trying to get a toddler to put on their shoe. But the tantrum take two years
Anonymous wrote:Here is what I saw in a friend's MSA:
The 529 plans remain the children's property and are to be spent on the education of the named beneficiary, and any leftover amount belongs to the named beneficiary. Parents agree to pay pro rata for the additional cost of a college degree. The higher earner was required to carry life insurance for the kids until the youngest was 23. Both parents split all direct costs of the kids - sports dues, equipment, tutors, car insurance, cell phones, out-of-pocket medical and dental, etc until each kid is 23—so, no lifelong or in-death commitments, but a commitment to get the kids through college.
Anonymous wrote:Personally, I’m hoping to come to an agreement without going to court, but I want to have everything well that out. In particular, I have medically complex kids and I need to make sure that they are always properly insured. I’m sure there are other things. I need to have a plan for with them, but making sure I get everything right is really getting me wound up. In theory, their father won’t be a jerk about their care, but I am wondering how things will change if and when there’s a new family involved.