Anonymous wrote:It is clear why he is being deported. Hamas is a terrorist organization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if they can do it to this guy without due process, then anyone is on the table.

Where is this process defined?

If it is defined by the State Department, by some interpretations, the POTUS may have the authority to decide how to implement the process.

Dur process comes from the constitution. The president cannot overrule it.

The process for qualifying or revoking green cards is defined in the Constitution?

Like it or not, immigration status largely falls under the Executive branch.

Anonymous wrote:It is clear why he is being deported. Hamas is a terrorist organization.

Anonymous wrote:Apparently there was an online campaign to get this guy deported. But nobody did their homework and knew he had a green card and not a visa. Or maybe they did and didn't care. From Dropsite news:

Over the course of Thursday and Friday, several prominent pro-Israel groups and individuals published a series of tweets targeting Khalil, mentioning his presence at the sit-in on Wednesday and his history as a lead negotiator with Columbia in April 2024, and demanded that the Trump administration act strongly against him by revoking his visa and deporting him. They tagged President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and US Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Shai Davidai, a professor at Columbia Business School, who was suspended from entering Columbia’s Morningside campus in 2024 following allegations of misconduct against students and staff of the university, tweeted, “Illegally taking over a college in which you are not even enrolled and distributing terrorist propaganda should be a deportable offense, no? Because that’s what Mahmoud Khalil from @ColumbiaSJP did yesterday at @BarnardCollege”.

“Documenting Jew Hatred on Campus at Columbia U”—an account on X with more than 20,000 followers—tweeted, “Secretary Rubio (@SecRubio), please revoke Mahmoud Khalil's visa!” On March 6, Rubio had tweeted that “those who support designated terrorist organizations, including Hamas, threaten our national security” and that such “violators of U.S law—including international students—face visa denial or revocation, and deportation.”

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/dhs-detains-columbia-university-student-gaza

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if they can do it to this guy without due process, then anyone is on the table.

Where is this process defined?

If it is defined by the State Department, by some interpretations, the POTUS may have the authority to decide how to implement the process.

Dur process comes from the constitution. The president cannot overrule it.

The process for qualifying or revoking green cards is defined in the Constitution?

Like it or not, immigration status largely falls under the Executive branch.

These are dictator moves. That's why decent President's don't touch this. Not the big orange though

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First they came for the aid workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the federal workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the universities, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the journalists, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the lawyers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for green card holders, and no one really cared.

Do people see where this ends?

Yup we can't keep ignoring this hoping for a hero....it will need to be we the people!

I thought no one was above the law? Let this play out in the courts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if they can do it to this guy without due process, then anyone is on the table.

Where is this process defined?

If it is defined by the State Department, by some interpretations, the POTUS may have the authority to decide how to implement the process.

Dur process comes from the constitution. The president cannot overrule it.

The process for qualifying or revoking green cards is defined in the Constitution?

Like it or not, immigration status largely falls under the Executive branch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First they came for the aid workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the federal workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the universities, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the journalists, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the lawyers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for green card holders, and no one really cared.

Do people see where this ends?

Yup we can't keep ignoring this hoping for a hero....it will need to be we the people!

Anonymous wrote:First they came for the aid workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the federal workers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the universities, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the journalists, and no one really cared.

Then they came for the lawyers, and no one really cared.

Then they came for green card holders, and no one really cared.

Do people see where this ends?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are visas issued by the State Department?

While Trump's actions might be viewed as arbitrary and capricious, i'm not sure he doesn't have the authority to revoke a student visa--or at least direct the Secretary of State to do so.

If you can lose your visa for flunking a couple of semesters, your presence here is obviously conditional.

Frankly, I'm not sure I feel that bad for the guy and I despise Trump.

He is not here on a student visa. He has a green card.

The state department can not just decide to revoke a green card. There is a procedure that has to be followed; only an immigration judge can revoke the green card.

This is a violation of his rights.

If the administration can do this do green card holders for pro-Palestinian speech, then what is stop them for doing this with pro-trans rights activists or any other issue that they don't like?

Every one of us should be outraged.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if they can do it to this guy without due process, then anyone is on the table.

Where is this process defined?

If it is defined by the State Department, by some interpretations, the POTUS may have the authority to decide how to implement the process.

Dur process comes from the constitution. The president cannot overrule it.