Anonymous wrote:Arlington way too high here. The program is rotting from its core. Most of the best players have escaped by the time they get to the oldest age groups - the coach at that level is completely incompetent and corrupted by parental influence. Can’t imagine she lasts much longer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA dad I wish, my kid would never be able to crack that lineup. I am GA dad questioning viability of a leagues that grows too fast and loses what it was created for. GAL was a girls academy league not an acronym a statement. Given the unsavory nature it appears of why these clubs like NVA are chooising their boys over girls and throwing them GA like a bone, I do not like. GAL was suppossed to be the girls league for girls with not influence nor involvement from the boys side. This is not longer true at all these new GA clubs becuase MLSN is the priority period!

That's an interesting comment. I too was attracted to GA (specifically FCV) a few years ago because it was focused on girls. The fact that the league's recent "success" is the result of clubs prioritizing their boys programs over their girls programs risks undermining that original cultural quality.

You guys still won’t answer the question. How are the girls being sacrificed here?

GA is till putting girls in college and they are a separate entity than mls next.

ECNL clubs out side of the top 20 would go to $#!+ if it wasn’t for that ECNL badge. You guys are despicable.

GA is not putting girls in college except for the top of the roster. Ecnl gets almost the entire roster.

Where’s the proof? only the top 20 clubs are lol. You think Pittsburgh riverhounds are putting more than 5 kids in college per team?

Anonymous wrote:1. VDA ECNL
2. Bethesda ECNL
2. Arlington ECNL
3. FVU (for now, if they lose ECNL they move down to 8 below MD Utd ECNL)
4. NVA GA
5. SYC GA
6. Loudoun GA
7. McLean GA
8. MD United ECNL
9. Revolution GA
10. TSJ GA

Discuss...

Anonymous wrote:Arlington way too high here. The program is rotting from its core. Most of the best players have escaped by the time they get to the oldest age groups - the coach at that level is completely incompetent and corrupted by parental influence. Can’t imagine she lasts much longer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA dad I wish, my kid would never be able to crack that lineup. I am GA dad questioning viability of a leagues that grows too fast and loses what it was created for. GAL was a girls academy league not an acronym a statement. Given the unsavory nature it appears of why these clubs like NVA are chooising their boys over girls and throwing them GA like a bone, I do not like. GAL was suppossed to be the girls league for girls with not influence nor involvement from the boys side. This is not longer true at all these new GA clubs becuase MLSN is the priority period!

That's an interesting comment. I too was attracted to GA (specifically FCV) a few years ago because it was focused on girls. The fact that the league's recent "success" is the result of clubs prioritizing their boys programs over their girls programs risks undermining that original cultural quality.

You guys still won’t answer the question. How are the girls being sacrificed here?

GA is till putting girls in college and they are a separate entity than mls next.

ECNL clubs out side of the top 20 would go to $#!+ if it wasn’t for that ECNL badge. You guys are despicable.

GA is not putting girls in college except for the top of the roster. Ecnl gets almost the entire roster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA dad I wish, my kid would never be able to crack that lineup. I am GA dad questioning viability of a leagues that grows too fast and loses what it was created for. GAL was a girls academy league not an acronym a statement. Given the unsavory nature it appears of why these clubs like NVA are chooising their boys over girls and throwing them GA like a bone, I do not like. GAL was suppossed to be the girls league for girls with not influence nor involvement from the boys side. This is not longer true at all these new GA clubs becuase MLSN is the priority period!

That's an interesting comment. I too was attracted to GA (specifically FCV) a few years ago because it was focused on girls. The fact that the league's recent "success" is the result of clubs prioritizing their boys programs over their girls programs risks undermining that original cultural quality.

You guys still won’t answer the question. How are the girls being sacrificed here?

GA is till putting girls in college and they are a separate entity than mls next.

ECNL clubs out side of the top 20 would go to $#!+ if it wasn’t for that ECNL badge. You guys are despicable.

GA is not putting girls in college except for the top of the roster. Ecnl gets almost the entire roster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A showcase in February yawn yes!

Love how we decide games that are played now mean nothing. I forgot only what you think is important matters. I am sure that you think VDA is greatest club in country. Once the Mid Atlantic teams get out of that terrible conference they always come up short.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:VDA dad I wish, my kid would never be able to crack that lineup. I am GA dad questioning viability of a leagues that grows too fast and loses what it was created for. GAL was a girls academy league not an acronym a statement. Given the unsavory nature it appears of why these clubs like NVA are chooising their boys over girls and throwing them GA like a bone, I do not like. GAL was suppossed to be the girls league for girls with not influence nor involvement from the boys side. This is not longer true at all these new GA clubs becuase MLSN is the priority period!

That's an interesting comment. I too was attracted to GA (specifically FCV) a few years ago because it was focused on girls. The fact that the league's recent "success" is the result of clubs prioritizing their boys programs over their girls programs risks undermining that original cultural quality.

You guys still won’t answer the question. How are the girls being sacrificed here?

GA is till putting girls in college and they are a separate entity than mls next.

ECNL clubs out side of the top 20 would go to $#!+ if it wasn’t for that ECNL badge. You guys are despicable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:pointless and stupid post

Agreed, who cares about girls soccer.

It is the only soccer worth caring about.

As an American facts. Why do we even fields a men's team at this point?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you had a flat out player, US regional ID level and such. Tell me one reason why you are not going to VDA other than afraid you might not get the playing time. Assuming commute is not a factor either. VDA>BSC all day

Because the play style and development sucks....low level soccer. Couple good players carrying the whole team they will find top schools to play for.... the rest not so much.

You lost me at “the development sucks”.