Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrong call MCPs for Tuesday. Read that last bit. They need qualified lawyers on their team. "Have instructed bus drivers to...impede visibility"? So all those other announcements/calls saying they need to make sure 13,024 bus stops are safe(r) to safely open out of abundance of caution and now putting this on bus drivers.
Pick up your kid early if you're concerned. Next thing you know you'll be saying we need to close because of rain.
How neighborly of you to offer to pick up kid not everyone is as privileged as you![]()
Odd response when the pp wanted school to close early for everyone.
No need to screw up things for everyone because a few people are scared of water.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS just posted their message doubling down on no early dismissal. Bus routes will be delayed because of limited visibility, but no worries. 🙄
I would say closed tomorrow but who knows anymore.
Anonymous wrote:"please plan to pick up your child close to dismissal"? What is close to? 1 hour, 30min prior, 2 hours??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrong call MCPs for Tuesday. Read that last bit. They need qualified lawyers on their team. "Have instructed bus drivers to...impede visibility"? So all those other announcements/calls saying they need to make sure 13,024 bus stops are safe(r) to safely open out of abundance of caution and now putting this on bus drivers.
Pick up your kid early if you're concerned. Next thing you know you'll be saying we need to close because of rain.
How neighborly of you to offer to pick up kid not everyone is as privileged as you![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS just posted their message doubling down on no early dismissal. Bus routes will be delayed because of limited visibility, but no worries. 🙄
I would say closed tomorrow but who knows anymore.
anyone smell lawsuit
Anonymous wrote:MCPS just posted their message doubling down on no early dismissal. Bus routes will be delayed because of limited visibility, but no worries. 🙄
I would say closed tomorrow but who knows anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS just posted their message doubling down on no early dismissal. Bus routes will be delayed because of limited visibility, but no worries. 🙄
I would say closed tomorrow but who knows anymore.
That message was completely mental. Anticipating limited visibility? Telling buses to drive slowly? That's basically admitting in advance that they know conditions could be dangerous. Did their lawyers approve that? Probably everything will be fine but this is totally out of line with every other school system in the area and OPM so if even one minor thing happens, they are going to be out on an island and strung up for regional ridicule. All risk for no reward.
The inconsistency in decision making between the 2-hour delay called 48 hours in advance, and this, is a total clown show.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrong call MCPs for Tuesday. Read that last bit. They need qualified lawyers on their team. "Have instructed bus drivers to...impede visibility"? So all those other announcements/calls saying they need to make sure 13,024 bus stops are safe(r) to safely open out of abundance of caution and now putting this on bus drivers.
Pick up your kid early if you're concerned. Next thing you know you'll be saying we need to close because of rain.
Anonymous wrote:Wrong call MCPs for Tuesday. Read that last bit. They need qualified lawyers on their team. "Have instructed bus drivers to...impede visibility"? So all those other announcements/calls saying they need to make sure 13,024 bus stops are safe(r) to safely open out of abundance of caution and now putting this on bus drivers.
Anonymous wrote:MCPS just posted their message doubling down on no early dismissal. Bus routes will be delayed because of limited visibility, but no worries. 🙄
I would say closed tomorrow but who knows anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure why Moderator locked the other Feb 11 thread. He should have waited to do that until McPS makes or doesn't make an announcement by 10:30am.
Right? Makes no sense
Hey Mr Moderator!
His name is Jeff, he's the owner of DCUM, and you can contact him directly by posting on Website Feedback.
He probably locked the other thread because it wasn't getting anywhere, and, just so you know, MCPS is doing a full day today (with cancelled after school activities, I imagine).
Snow isn't accumulating until 5pm according to most recent models. It's plenty of time for even tier 2 elementary buses to drop off kids in their neighborhoods.
Duh.
Just like you so did the other posters, that's why this thread when CO doesn't send out message, it's all posters did - imagine.
Now THAT's a word salad.
What are you trying to say?
What are you trying to say is a word salad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is super cold out there!
Super dangerously cold! It might even drop below freezing!
So snow will stick after all, before regular dismissal?!!