Anonymous wrote:Not surprised. Women and most black people already know Trump hates them and there is no way he will come around to their point of view. There is nothing to lose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.

You say “women” and then only mention one. And while I think that RBG should have stepped aside, it wasn’t a matter of a lack of courage. Maybe pride, or ego. Words mean things! Speaking of dumb…

Besides, if you want to talk about not stepping aside, there are a dozen old men for every RBG, Biden being the most significant of all in terms of getting us in to this debacle.

OP is correct that women are speaking out more than men.

Nancy Pelosi, Feinstein, the list goes on of old stubborn bats who won't step aside that has allowed the Democratic party to get decimated, opening the door to a complete totalitarian take over.

And I guess Biden not stepping aside is irrelevant?
Still has nothing to do with courage, btw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

So true.

(And rather ironic, given this regime’s toxic masculinity)

Anonymous wrote:Not surprised. Women and most black people already know Trump hates them and there is no way he will come around to their point of view. There is nothing to lose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.

You say “women” and then only mention one. And while I think that RBG should have stepped aside, it wasn’t a matter of a lack of courage. Maybe pride, or ego. Words mean things! Speaking of dumb…

Besides, if you want to talk about not stepping aside, there are a dozen old men for every RBG, Biden being the most significant of all in terms of getting us in to this debacle.

OP is correct that women are speaking out more than men.

Nancy Pelosi, Feinstein, the list goes on of old stubborn bats who won't step aside that has allowed the Democratic party to get decimated, opening the door to a complete totalitarian take over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?

Stop this crap. Show me objective evidence. This is part of why Trump won.

I am man who is all over this illegal admin. What about Chris VanHollen, Jamie Raskin? They were some of the first two leaders to start pushing back. Why try to start some BS circular firing squad? We need to come together at this moment and not argue based on BS.

Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?

"It's contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and their grandparents to live a decent life," Ginsburg said, according to Couric's recording from the 2016 sitdown. "Which they probably could not have lived, in the places they came from … As they become older they realize that this was a youthful folly. And that's why education is important."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That women are more likely to stand up to Trump than men?

We have more to lose, and a disturbing number of these "men" would be happy to see us lose it, so this tracks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The two women to stand up to trump (Clinton and Harris) both lost and that's why he's in the White House in the first place. Clean up your mess ladies!

You are confused about OP’s post.

OP was the flip side of the same ignorant coin. Gender based bigotry is always ignorant.

It is gender pride.

See Danielle Sassoon. 38 years old, and stood up in a way none of those “powerful” Republican senators have done.

Brava,

Because the Republicans support Trump, moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Notice that most of the people speaking out against gun violence, violence by illegals, sex trafficking, rape as a weapon of war are women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The two women to stand up to trump (Clinton and Harris) both lost and that's why he's in the White House in the first place. Clean up your mess ladies!

You are confused about OP’s post.

OP was the flip side of the same ignorant coin. Gender based bigotry is always ignorant.

It is gender pride.

See Danielle Sassoon. 38 years old, and stood up in a way none of those “powerful” Republican senators have done.

Brava,

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/nyregion/danielle-sassoon-quit-eric-adams.html?unlocked_article_code=1.wk4.zVmL.UB4ABbHrVcd-

"Then, when Justice Department officials sought to transfer the case to the public integrity section in Washington, which oversees corruption cases, the two men who led that unit also resigned, according to five people with knowledge of the matter."

2:1, men standing up more than women.

Will you go away now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.

You say “women” and then only mention one. And while I think that RBG should have stepped aside, it wasn’t a matter of a lack of courage. Maybe pride, or ego. Words mean things! Speaking of dumb…

Besides, if you want to talk about not stepping aside, there are a dozen old men for every RBG, Biden being the most significant of all in terms of getting us in to this debacle.

OP is correct that women are speaking out more than men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are far more courageous, in general. I know that people will come at me, because men have traditionally been the ones to fight in war. But of course there are many reasons for that that have nothing to do with bravery.
In my own life, it is always the women who stand up, even in matters of violence, while the men do nothing.

Oh please. Women like Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't have the courage to step down when appropriate. They got us into this debacle.

Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, MLK, Thich Quang Duc....

You are really dumb.