Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just don't thank in advance. In biz school they say it's rude.
Hi Larla - Can you get me those TPS reports? Thaaanks!
TIA!
Anonymous wrote:Just don't thank in advance. In biz school they say it's rude.
Hi Larla - Can you get me those TPS reports? Thaaanks!
Anonymous wrote:I use both Thanks! and Thanks, and I have totally different meanings/tone in mind when I use them.
(And if you get a Thanks. from me, you're in trouble.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check out nohello.net and be aware there is a movement towards reducing inefficiencies in digital comms, that some people subscribe to. A lot of my coworkers are part of the No hello camp. Make sure you’re not committing any faux pads outlined on that site. It’s less about saying hello and more about not wasting peoples time. IMO it’s perfectly fine (and human) to say hello, please, thanks! etc. But if someone doesn’t, it may be they are thinking they’re being efficient.
I checked out the webpage and it is addressing IM type communications (Slack, TEAMS, etc.). The point of the website is not to send someone a message with "Hi" and then wait for a response before asking the question that started the communication. E-mail is different since presumably you are not just saying "Hi [Name]" and then waiting for a response back before asking your questions/sharing information. Instant Messaging and E-mailing are two different methods of communication with very different rules. You wouldn't apply basketball rules to baseball even though they are both played with a ball.
That’s all correct. Your op says you’re more comfortable with people who communicate the way you do, so I am just making you aware that there is a diversity of opinion on digital etiquette and what one person considers brusque, another may consider to be clear and concise.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I agree with you. Tone is very hard to judge in email and I’d rather err on the side of approachability.
Anonymous wrote:I started using Hi [Name] and Thanks! in order to not come across as "aggressive." I'll also say that I am a female and I've been told my tone is "too aggressive" so I've intentionally tried to soften it. I work in a heavily male dominated industry so I think it's all thinly veiled sexism, but it's easy to do and if it makes people more likely to do what I ask them to do, then so be it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was told to never use exclamation points in business correspondence. So I didn't for years. Then I worked for a brilliant woman in leadership who did, and I saw how they can work well in the right circumstances (for industry context -- I'm a lawyer). I occasionally use "Hi" but only in email conversations with people I know well that are relatively casual in subject matter.
OP here - also a lawyer here. I'm in my mid 30s and kind of in the middle ranks at my company...I definitely notice that the level of formality and use of exclamation marks changes with age/seniority.
I don't tend to use exclamation marks outside of "Thanks!" For whatever reason, thanks with a period just rubs me the wrong way. Kind of like "thanks...but not really". So I never bring myself to subject other people to that. Ha, again with the overthinking.
Anonymous wrote:I totally agree and do the same. It is probably overthinking but I still do it.
Anonymous wrote:If you’re not supposed to start an email with “Hello Larlo,” or “Hi Larlo,” what are you supposed to do? I’ll be honest, every person I’ve worked for/with who just starts emails with “Larlo,” is an older man, very brusque to the point of coming across abrasive in person, or foreign.