Anonymous wrote:The linked article gives no detail whatsoever about how the interview was edited to make her look better than Trump. Is it not common knowledge that interviews are edited for time and clarity? From what I have seen, she gave a very long response. Of course they only showed a portion of it, but the clip was consistent with her entire response. I guess they made her look better by showing that she can give an articulate response rather tbsn stomping off like Trump did in 2020?
Reading the comments on this thread make it very clear that people do not understand the difference between an accredited news organization and entertainment news. And that is the problem with media in this country. We need to have a very clear distinction because allowing people to choose their own reality is simply not working. Maybe every single non-accredited program needs to have a disclaimer at the beginning. Idk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone is falling in line. What a disgrace.
This.....journalists will be afraid to do their job with honestly and integrity. They will have to pledge allegiance to the king and lie to make him look somewhat good.
They’re losing these lawsuits because they didn’t do the job with honesty and integrity. That’s the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I guess they tried to make Harris look better with retakes on live interviews?
https://www.salon.com/2025/01/31/cbs-news-parent-may-settle-frivolous-filed-over-60-minutes-harris-interview/
They edited her answers on tape. Played one for the tease to watch the show and a different answer in the aired interview. Still not sure which answer was the real one.
As for Trump, in 2020, Lesley Stahl argued with him about Hunter's laptop and claimed it was Russian disinformation.
So, not exactly fair.
So what? FOX heavily edited interviews with Trump. https://newrepublic.com/post/182164/fox-news-edited-trump-interview https://www.rawstory.com/heavily-edited-trump-fox-interview et cetera.
Hunter's laptop did turn out to be disinformation.
We were told Hunter's laptop contained smoking gun evidence of a vast bribery and corruption scheme funneling tens of millions of dollars to Joe Biden.
The only thing it actually revealed was that Hunter had a drug problem and failed to disclose it on a gun form. And we also found out that Alexander Smirnov, the Republicans star witness about the alleged massive bribery and corruption scheme LIED about it. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgnl7qdvjno That's what disinformation is, it's lying.
Fair would mean that now FOX News should be sued over how it handled Trump interviews, favorably editing them to make Trump look a lot better and more coherent than he actually is, and they could use the suit against CBS as ammunition against Trump and cite the hypocrisy of going after CBS.
Seriously, I do think a team of Democrats with legal resources and access to some donor funds need to band together on this and start out with some big-fish lawsuits that they can get big financial settlements out of, and use that to bootstrap a legal war chest to use for staffing a substantial orchestrated legal campaign of lawsuits against conservative media outlets that spread lies to boost Trump to repeatedly go after them for multimillion dollar settlements and awards, and leave them the choice of either starting to report fairly and honestly and critically about Trump or getting hit every time they lie for him - and also settlement funds and resources to band together with all of the other groups leading lawsuits against Trump, such as the blue states suing for overreach, the civil servant unions and so on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I bet Trump would easily settle if CBS would release the whole transcript of the Harris interview.
And, recall, again, in Trump's 2020 interview, Stahl basically called Trump a liar when he brought up the HUnter laptop.
Turned out Trump WAS lying about the content of the laptop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I guess they tried to make Harris look better with retakes on live interviews?
https://www.salon.com/2025/01/31/cbs-news-parent-may-settle-frivolous-filed-over-60-minutes-harris-interview/
Wow , they would do all of this but when it came to controlling illegal immigration, that was a firm no.
Democrats need to focus on policies that US voters want and start winning elections.
Bedause the voters wanted all the project 2025 crap being shoved down our throat now? Do you have amnesia about how far the Trumo campaign ran from project 2025?
Anonymous wrote:Wow, I guess they tried to make Harris look better with retakes on live interviews?
https://www.salon.com/2025/01/31/cbs-news-parent-may-settle-frivolous-filed-over-60-minutes-harris-interview/