Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they suddenly are experiencing a lack of sea parting for straight men in society and are having breakdowns and being crybabies. Mad because society has started to value competence and excellence over gender/race/physical appearance/stereotypes of what kind of people should be in what roles in society.
How old are you? Just curious.
Old enough to remember when stereotypes held women and minorities back from certain careers, leadership roles, etc. Young enough to appreciate society's evolution.
Ah. At first I thought you were 20. Now I see that you are 80. Well, glad you have men all figured out. You should go tell them, straighten them out. Since some of them seem to be struggling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here… how do we stop this victimization? And are they really actually victims? I find it very hard to believe this. Is there any actual evidence of this?
All women are the victims. Not men.
But the men are claiming they are victims in the article!
erroneously
Exactly. How dare men try to get in on victim status? In the victim Olympics, women come in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. With gay men coming in 4th.
Straight men have no chance of medaling.
I think black people come in first, hispanics second, women third, gay men fourth (although gay men have been killed just for being gay and have struggles of their own in certain situations)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they suddenly are experiencing a lack of sea parting for straight men in society and are having breakdowns and being crybabies. Mad because society has started to value competence and excellence over gender/race/physical appearance/stereotypes of what kind of people should be in what roles in society.
How old are you? Just curious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to speak specifically to the door holding thing:
20 years ago I was an intern in the US Senate and gave constituent tours. In between making up facts about the capitol building, I had to usher people through doors that required a badge swipe to access. Standard procedure was: I swipe my badge, open door, hold it as they all walk through, I close door and secure it.
This would *break* some of the men on my tours. Especially older men, but young ones too. They couldn't handle having a 20 yr old woman hold a door open for them. Some of them would try to forcibly take the door from me. Most would just stand there, waiting for me to go through the door before them. I would explain i had to go through last. They would persist, say things like "I wasn't raised that way."
It was a small inconvenience but it was also deranged and really stuck with me. Perhaps they just struggled with a rule that had always been drilled into them (ladies first). Or perhaps the role reversal felt like a loss of status and control.
But that's what I thought about when I read the thing about these men feeling like women didn't want them to hold open doors for them.
Sorry you had to deal with this. So stupid.
I agree. Women never behave awkwardly or follow rules that may not apply in some situations. We are perfect! And also victims!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here… how do we stop this victimization? And are they really actually victims? I find it very hard to believe this. Is there any actual evidence of this?
All women are the victims. Not men.
But the men are claiming they are victims in the article!
erroneously
Exactly. How dare men try to get in on victim status? In the victim Olympics, women come in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. With gay men coming in 4th.
Straight men have no chance of medaling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want to speak specifically to the door holding thing:
20 years ago I was an intern in the US Senate and gave constituent tours. In between making up facts about the capitol building, I had to usher people through doors that required a badge swipe to access. Standard procedure was: I swipe my badge, open door, hold it as they all walk through, I close door and secure it.
This would *break* some of the men on my tours. Especially older men, but young ones too. They couldn't handle having a 20 yr old woman hold a door open for them. Some of them would try to forcibly take the door from me. Most would just stand there, waiting for me to go through the door before them. I would explain i had to go through last. They would persist, say things like "I wasn't raised that way."
It was a small inconvenience but it was also deranged and really stuck with me. Perhaps they just struggled with a rule that had always been drilled into them (ladies first). Or perhaps the role reversal felt like a loss of status and control.
But that's what I thought about when I read the thing about these men feeling like women didn't want them to hold open doors for them.
Sorry you had to deal with this. So stupid.
Anonymous wrote:I want to speak specifically to the door holding thing:
20 years ago I was an intern in the US Senate and gave constituent tours. In between making up facts about the capitol building, I had to usher people through doors that required a badge swipe to access. Standard procedure was: I swipe my badge, open door, hold it as they all walk through, I close door and secure it.
This would *break* some of the men on my tours. Especially older men, but young ones too. They couldn't handle having a 20 yr old woman hold a door open for them. Some of them would try to forcibly take the door from me. Most would just stand there, waiting for me to go through the door before them. I would explain i had to go through last. They would persist, say things like "I wasn't raised that way."
It was a small inconvenience but it was also deranged and really stuck with me. Perhaps they just struggled with a rule that had always been drilled into them (ladies first). Or perhaps the role reversal felt like a loss of status and control.
But that's what I thought about when I read the thing about these men feeling like women didn't want them to hold open doors for them.
Anonymous wrote:I want to speak specifically to the door holding thing:
20 years ago I was an intern in the US Senate and gave constituent tours. In between making up facts about the capitol building, I had to usher people through doors that required a badge swipe to access. Standard procedure was: I swipe my badge, open door, hold it as they all walk through, I close door and secure it.
This would *break* some of the men on my tours. Especially older men, but young ones too. They couldn't handle having a 20 yr old woman hold a door open for them. Some of them would try to forcibly take the door from me. Most would just stand there, waiting for me to go through the door before them. I would explain i had to go through last. They would persist, say things like "I wasn't raised that way."
It was a small inconvenience but it was also deranged and really stuck with me. Perhaps they just struggled with a rule that had always been drilled into them (ladies first). Or perhaps the role reversal felt like a loss of status and control.
But that's what I thought about when I read the thing about these men feeling like women didn't want them to hold open doors for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here… how do we stop this victimization? And are they really actually victims? I find it very hard to believe this. Is there any actual evidence of this?
All women are the victims. Not men.
But the men are claiming they are victims in the article!
erroneously
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they suddenly are experiencing a lack of sea parting for straight men in society and are having breakdowns and being crybabies. Mad because society has started to value competence and excellence over gender/race/physical appearance/stereotypes of what kind of people should be in what roles in society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here… how do we stop this victimization? And are they really actually victims? I find it very hard to believe this. Is there any actual evidence of this?
All women are the victims. Not men.
But the men are claiming they are victims in the article!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here… how do we stop this victimization? And are they really actually victims? I find it very hard to believe this. Is there any actual evidence of this?
All women are the victims. Not men.