Anonymous
Post 01/19/2025 19:26     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Union:

2013: ML
2012: MV
2011: LO
2010: MV
2009: BL
2008: NM


This can’t be right. LO needs to drop down to 2012s. She should not be coaching a high school team.


Or any ECNL team.


2011s are not a priority for the club. That’s pretty obvious.


Wrong. LO is one of the best coaches in the area.
Anonymous
Post 01/19/2025 16:09     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VDA:

2013: AS
2012: AS
2011: BP
2010: BP
2009: ML
2007/2008: ML


Everyone on this forum only focus on the girls side. Why is the helicopter parents more on the girls side?


Because there are less spots for boys soccer and half of that is international.
128 girls ECNL teams, 151 ECNL boys teams.


The poster right after you is correct. I meant for college soccer. For boys, unless you are on the top of a top team, your only option to play in college is going to a college you have never heard of before and would never go there otherwise.
Many more helicopter parents on girls side but there are more parents on boys side.
Anonymous
Post 01/19/2025 15:11     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VDA:

2013: AS
2012: AS
2011: BP
2010: BP
2009: ML
2007/2008: ML


Everyone on this forum only focus on the girls side. Why is the helicopter parents more on the girls side?


Because there are less spots for boys soccer and half of that is international.
128 girls ECNL teams, 151 ECNL boys teams.


The poster right after you is correct. I meant for college soccer. For boys, unless you are on the top of a top team, your only option to play in college is going to a college you have never heard of before and would never go there otherwise.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 20:46     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Union:

2013: ML
2012: MV
2011: LO
2010: MV
2009: BL
2008: NM


This can’t be right. LO needs to drop down to 2012s. She should not be coaching a high school team.


Or any ECNL team.


2011s are not a priority for the club. That’s pretty obvious.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 20:22     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Union:

2013: ML
2012: MV
2011: LO
2010: MV
2009: BL
2008: NM


This can’t be right. LO needs to drop down to 2012s. She should not be coaching a high school team.


Or any ECNL team.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 19:25     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
Anonymous wrote:Union:

2013: ML
2012: MV
2011: LO
2010: MV
2009: BL
2008: NM


This can’t be right. LO needs to drop down to 2012s. She should not be coaching a high school team.
Anonymous
Post 01/17/2025 17:35     Subject: 2025-2026 ECNL Coaching Projections
They were referring to collegiate spots likely