Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a misunderstanding, I dont have any understanding. That is why is asked. But, this whole thing still has me concerned. Someone walked through the neighborhood, took pictures of private homes and then distributed it to the world. As it happens, it’s a pretty good roadmap to the home of one of the most threatened people in the US. Absent that it’s still troubling but I now understand that it’s permissible.
Who? Brett?
If he does not like it, he can move to a more secure location in Potomac.
No. Fauci.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a misunderstanding, I dont have any understanding. That is why is asked. But, this whole thing still has me concerned. Someone walked through the neighborhood, took pictures of private homes and then distributed it to the world. As it happens, it’s a pretty good roadmap to the home of one of the most threatened people in the US. Absent that it’s still troubling but I now understand that it’s permissible.
Who? Brett?
If he does not like it, he can move to a more secure location in Potomac.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do realize you can see your house on google street view?!
Not mine. I blocked it, which anyone can choose to do.
Bought my house before Zillow so the info the website is incorrect, and there are no photos of the home’s interior.
DP
Realtor? Redfin? Or your neighbor took a pic of your house in the background and posted online. Or not - It’s likely not online anywhere.
But really why would you even care!? Unless it’s posted your name and that it’s yours and the exact address.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do realize you can see your house on google street view?!
Not mine. I blocked it, which anyone can choose to do.
Bought my house before Zillow so the info the website is incorrect, and there are no photos of the home’s interior.
DP
Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a misunderstanding, I dont have any understanding. That is why is asked. But, this whole thing still has me concerned. Someone walked through the neighborhood, took pictures of private homes and then distributed it to the world. As it happens, it’s a pretty good roadmap to the home of one of the most threatened people in the US. Absent that it’s still troubling but I now understand that it’s permissible.
Anonymous wrote:You do realize you can see your house on google street view?!
Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a misunderstanding, I dont have any understanding. That is why is asked. But, this whole thing still has me concerned. Someone walked through the neighborhood, took pictures of private homes and then distributed it to the world. As it happens, it’s a pretty good roadmap to the home of one of the most threatened people in the US. Absent that it’s still troubling but I now understand that it’s permissible.
Anonymous wrote:This has happened to us a couple of times in the last 3-4 weeks. We are tucked away in a cul-de-sac. I happened to be standing by the window looking out and the car was slowly driving around the circle, and then stopped in front of our driveaway. I thought it was a delivery, but then noticed the back passenger window was down and the young girl was either taking a video or photos of our house.
It does concern me, our house can't help real estate agents with the local comparables as it is a new built. There is nothing historically remarkable about the house, typical Classic homes house.
What other reasons could there be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the publication aspect? I wish I could find and repost the slide show. I get using public facilities to photograph something in public but what about putting it on the internet? Additionally, what about the issues associated with the high profile people who have security? Is there an exception?
Why wouldn't you be able to post a picture of a house on the internet? The photo is owned by the photographer who took it.
High profile people who have security live behind gates for this reason.