Anonymous wrote:OP here. The teacher only gave rebuttals to the student whose speech was about admiring Donald Trump and the student whose speech was about admiring Andrew Tate. The boys are friends. There is a perception that the teacher does not like these boys and targets them because their political opinions are different from hers and the boys feel uncomfortable in her class now.
Anonymous wrote:He's a convicted felon. I think the child should be questioned about why they admire someone who was convicted of a felony and is a rapist. School is an excellent place to learn that's not okay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It is 9th grade English class, not social studies. The kids were doing some kind of exercise where they had to explain why they admired somebody. The student in question chose Trump. The teacher started questioning him after he delivered his speech, asking how he could admire a person who XYZ and 123.
If XYZ and 123 were facts that is fine.
It's like writing a persuasive speech to get rid of public schools and the teacher states well what about XYZ?
If you can't see that you are tribal.
Only if she gives similar rebuttals to other students, and isn't selectively targeting certain people.
Einstein abused his wife.
OP here. The teacher only gave rebuttals to the student whose speech was about admiring Donald Trump and the student whose speech was about admiring Andrew Tate. The boys are friends. There is a perception that the teacher does not like these boys and targets them because their political opinions are different from hers and the boys feel uncomfortable in her class now.
Anonymous wrote:*without earning OR giving...
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It is 9th grade English class, not social studies. The kids were doing some kind of exercise where they had to explain why they admired somebody. The student in question chose Trump. The teacher started questioning him after he delivered his speech, asking how he could admire a person who XYZ and 123.
Anonymous wrote:I bet !! It's almost impossible not to !
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It is 9th grade English class, not social studies. The kids were doing some kind of exercise where they had to explain why they admired somebody. The student in question chose Trump. The teacher started questioning him after he delivered his speech, asking how he could admire a person who XYZ and 123.
If XYZ and 123 were facts that is fine.
It's like writing a persuasive speech to get rid of public schools and the teacher states well what about XYZ?
If you can't see that you are tribal.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It is 9th grade English class, not social studies. The kids were doing some kind of exercise where they had to explain why they admired somebody. The student in question chose Trump. The teacher started questioning him after he delivered his speech, asking how he could admire a person who XYZ and 123.