Anonymous wrote:From another post, but why is it that Wellesley is so underrated nationally? It has a direct relationship with MIT, has just as high of an endowment as WASP, and is always ranked right under WASP. Why isn’t it more respected?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because even as a women’s college it ranks in feeders for law school, business school, and med school (adjusted for undergrad enrollment). My DD goes to Wellesley and although the social scene isn’t the best, she loves it. It’s very academic. The kids are studying all the time. She complains a bit how rigorous it is. Wellesley only recently took away their grade deflation policy. But, it still lingers with many professors and subjects. She told me that her dean said a B at Wellesley is an A elsewhere. She says the student body is very ambitious. (Most) Professors are great. She’s made good friends in her first semester. Not a perfect school by any means. Also, some of the girls either party on campus and bring their MIT/Harvard boyfriends or go to MIT/Harvard/Olin/Babson/BU for parties.
Their freshman retention rate doesn’t seem to be the greatest and match other LACs. About 90-93%. So 10% of freshman leave or transfer. It is a specific environment for a specific group of people.
Medical school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-medical-school
Law school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-law-school
Business school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-business-school
The deans at Wellesley went to low class schools like UMass Dartmouth and UVM, so their point of view isn’t the most intellectual.
Anonymous wrote:I think the question is framed wrong. Why is WASP so highly overrated on this forum when they don’t indicate any substantial difference in outcomes compared to many “lesser” peers in the t20. There’s an outcome difference going to Yale over Notre Dame or Rice. You frankly may have a better outcome going to Middlebury or CMC or Davidson over Swarthmore.
\Anonymous wrote:From another post, but why is it that Wellesley is so underrated nationally? It has a direct relationship with MIT, has just as high of an endowment as WASP, and is always ranked right under WASP. Why isn’t it more respected?
Anonymous wrote:Because even as a women’s college it ranks in feeders for law school, business school, and med school (adjusted for undergrad enrollment). My DD goes to Wellesley and although the social scene isn’t the best, she loves it. It’s very academic. The kids are studying all the time. She complains a bit how rigorous it is. Wellesley only recently took away their grade deflation policy. But, it still lingers with many professors and subjects. She told me that her dean said a B at Wellesley is an A elsewhere. She says the student body is very ambitious. (Most) Professors are great. She’s made good friends in her first semester. Not a perfect school by any means. Also, some of the girls either party on campus and bring their MIT/Harvard boyfriends or go to MIT/Harvard/Olin/Babson/BU for parties.
Their freshman retention rate doesn’t seem to be the greatest and match other LACs. About 90-93%. So 10% of freshman leave or transfer. It is a specific environment for a specific group of people.
Medical school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-medical-school
Law school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-law-school
Business school: https://www.collegetransitions.com/dataverse/top-feeders-business-school
Anonymous wrote:What percentage lesbian/trans is it?
Anonymous wrote:Wellesley is an exceptional school with exceptional women. It is selective, it has had below a 15% acceptance rate for a while now. Again, one of the reasons it is not talked about much here is that it is not an option for half of the posters. It has great placements for grad school in many fields. The sciences are becoming stronger, they have newly renovated dorms - and a plan in place to continue to renovate every year through 20240 - and will have a new library this fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What percentage lesbian/trans is it?
Over proportional 35%
Anonymous wrote:What percentage lesbian/trans is it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What percentage lesbian/trans is it?
Reported, this is inappropriate and has nothing to do with the conversation.
DP, but I think it is relevant. The social scene at college is a factor in student selection. A women’s college is already a limited social scene. But then factor in a women’s college where a very large percentage, maybe even majority of the women are gay and this makes it even more limiting. That makes their pool of students they attract very small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What percentage lesbian/trans is it?
Reported, this is inappropriate and has nothing to do with the conversation.