Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?

In case you haven’t realized most employees aren’t free to insult their employer without consequences.

What we are trying to explain is that ethical owners do not influence their staff. Why are you going to bat for billionaires that want to keep you ignorant rather than joining with your fellow citizens who are trying to hold the wealthy to account?

Tomorrow try this, I want you to either write a letter or make a scathing video criticizing the owner of your company to post on your company website. Run it by your managers and see if they let you do it.

Let us know how it goes.

I don't work at a news org but I actually have worked at agencies where we openly criticized the owners. There is a long history of news org owners not interfering with critical opinions of themselves. This has happened before. It used to be the gold standard. This is not a fantasy. Helooooooo in there......

Anonymous wrote:

Her first good comic in how many years?

Anonymous wrote:And the cartoon has gone viral.

Bezos is such an ineffectual idiot.

Bezos is cleaning house at WaPo in an attempt to bring back his credibility. He doesn't care about this cartoon; this is a long term project.

Imagine some internet genius calling Bezos an ineffectual idiot lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

The snowflake is the person who quit in a huff.

This is what happens when everyone gets a participation trophy.

No what happens is Jan6.

And the cartoon has gone viral.

Bezos is such an ineffectual idiot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?

In case you haven’t realized most employees aren’t free to insult their employer without consequences.

What we are trying to explain is that ethical owners do not influence their staff. Why are you going to bat for billionaires that want to keep you ignorant rather than joining with your fellow citizens who are trying to hold the wealthy to account?

Tomorrow try this, I want you to either write a letter or make a scathing video criticizing the owner of your company to post on your company website. Run it by your managers and see if they let you do it.

Let us know how it goes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?

In case you haven’t realized most employees aren’t free to insult their employer without consequences.

What we are trying to explain is that ethical owners do not influence their staff. Why are you going to bat for billionaires that want to keep you ignorant rather than joining with your fellow citizens who are trying to hold the wealthy to account?

It's not a matter of influencing staff to report inaccurately, but of exercising judgment in what a cartoonist chooses to make fun of and/or criticize in the first place. Making a specific effort to be critical of the boss, instead of writing about any other topic, seems remarkably ill-advised and a display of appallingly bad judgment. There is no special immunity for cartoonists to draw anything which occurs to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

The snowflake is the person who quit in a huff.

This is what happens when everyone gets a participation trophy.

Your love for these billionaires is pathetic.

It’s not love for billionaires, it’s zero sympathy for a tantruming cartoonist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?

In case you haven’t realized most employees aren’t free to insult their employer without consequences.

What we are trying to explain is that ethical owners do not influence their staff. Why are you going to bat for billionaires that want to keep you ignorant rather than joining with your fellow citizens who are trying to hold the wealthy to account?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?

In case you haven’t realized most employees aren’t free to insult their employer without consequences.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

The snowflake is the person who quit in a huff.

This is what happens when everyone gets a participation trophy.

God, another traitorous trumpanzee weakling. That faux masculinity is pathetic. The political cartoonist has more testosterone than your average conservative “man” will ever have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

The snowflake is the person who quit in a huff.

This is what happens when everyone gets a participation trophy.

Your love for these billionaires is pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

This type of shaming has stopped working. People are sick of your crap.

Poor widdle billionaires. We hurt their feewings and made them ashamed.
So sad 😭

It's not sad, it's just ineffective. Carry on though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t know Bezos was such a snowflake.

The snowflake is the person who quit in a huff.

This is what happens when everyone gets a participation trophy.

So then you are hyper focused on personal values regarding recreational kids athletics but you don’t have any sense of ethics regarding a free press and the role that serves in a free society. How does a person end up like that?

Anonymous wrote:If you work for a newspaper don’t insult the paper’s owner.

So then. wealthy person can just buy good press for themselves? Why would that be a good thing?