Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had seen some roles there that are perrrfect for me but have not applied as no way am i doing 5 day a week rto.
I did hear rumblings they may be walking it back. Does anyone have any intel?
Don’t worry, you wouldn’t make it past the bar raiser.
Op - I’ve been recruited by them in the past (had another job at the time) so much as I know you hate the idea of people having choices - they in fact do!
Being recruited means nothing. They interview a bunch of people for one job and you have to interview with very specific answers to make it through each step. This isn't just a regular job interview.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Because they can pay them less. The work is there.
PP claimed they were trying to reduce headcount. If people quit because of RTO and then you hire people to replace them, you haven’t reduced headcount. Also, since when does it cost less to hire new employees? That actually costs more.
I work for a different company. I had 3 employees that didn’t want to RTO after Covid ended. They were low performers on a team I inherited after Covid. They were also difficult to manage and thought they were untouchable due to tenure. We let all 3 go and replaced them with much better associates making 25% less salary. The new associates were better, far more productive, and cheaper.
Thats an anomaly then. Whenever I’ve had to hire a replacement, I have had to pay the same or more than the person I replaced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Because they can pay them less. The work is there.
PP claimed they were trying to reduce headcount. If people quit because of RTO and then you hire people to replace them, you haven’t reduced headcount. Also, since when does it cost less to hire new employees? That actually costs more.
I work for a different company. I had 3 employees that didn’t want to RTO after Covid ended. They were low performers on a team I inherited after Covid. They were also difficult to manage and thought they were untouchable due to tenure. We let all 3 go and replaced them with much better associates making 25% less salary. The new associates were better, far more productive, and cheaper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Because they can pay them less. The work is there.
PP claimed they were trying to reduce headcount. If people quit because of RTO and then you hire people to replace them, you haven’t reduced headcount. Also, since when does it cost less to hire new employees? That actually costs more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Because they can pay them less. The work is there.
PP claimed they were trying to reduce headcount. If people quit because of RTO and then you hire people to replace them, you haven’t reduced headcount. Also, since when does it cost less to hire new employees? That actually costs more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Because they can pay them less. The work is there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
So why are they hiring new employees?
Anonymous wrote:Amazon is bloated. RTO is an easy way to reduce headcount without layoffs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work at Amazon. It is not being walked back. Full stop.
There used to be frequent articles about the caustic work environment at Amazon before WFH. Wonder if that's about to come back as well.
Yes that’s the “culture” they want to bring back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had seen some roles there that are perrrfect for me but have not applied as no way am i doing 5 day a week rto.
I did hear rumblings they may be walking it back. Does anyone have any intel?
Don’t worry, you wouldn’t make it past the bar raiser.
Op - I’ve been recruited by them in the past (had another job at the time) so much as I know you hate the idea of people having choices - they in fact do!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had seen some roles there that are perrrfect for me but have not applied as no way am i doing 5 day a week rto.
I did hear rumblings they may be walking it back. Does anyone have any intel?
Don’t worry, you wouldn’t make it past the bar raiser.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work at Amazon. It is not being walked back. Full stop.
There used to be frequent articles about the caustic work environment at Amazon before WFH. Wonder if that's about to come back as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way it's being implemented is a mess. I work at HQ2 in Crystal City and went in today. Office was pretty much empty (at least my floor). My team STILL has not received clear instructions from our manager regarding if you have to come in everyday 9-5.
Stop asking about this! There is no official policy to date and we don't want one because it will be bad. It's a hush hush thing, we are all coffee badging some days, so let's keep it that way...
Please don’t do that and play games and ruin things for everyone. The official policy was rto starting today.
I'm an L8. This is my policy and I'm well aware of the RTO mandate and what the official stance is. RTO had never been more than badge swipes.