Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, we've all done so well letting the Kardashian family wither on the vine, let's not make them a topic of discussion again.

I know, I know. I so want 2025 to be the year they go away but then I read we are entering the most aesthetically atrocious time: cyber trucks, ai art, this video, etc. it is depressing.

Wut?

Cyber trucks are awesome looking and zero-emissions.

Seriously? The trucks that are rusting, breaking down in rain and look like a 5 year old designed thrm???

I don't get how they are a truck. There's no open bed?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, we've all done so well letting the Kardashian family wither on the vine, let's not make them a topic of discussion again.

I know, I know. I so want 2025 to be the year they go away but then I read we are entering the most aesthetically atrocious time: cyber trucks, ai art, this video, etc. it is depressing.

Wut?

Cyber trucks are awesome looking and zero-emissions.

Seriously? The trucks that are rusting, breaking down in rain and look like a 5 year old designed thrm???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, we've all done so well letting the Kardashian family wither on the vine, let's not make them a topic of discussion again.

I know, I know. I so want 2025 to be the year they go away but then I read we are entering the most aesthetically atrocious time: cyber trucks, ai art, this video, etc. it is depressing.

Wut?

Cyber trucks are awesome looking and zero-emissions.

Seriously? The trucks that are rusting, breaking down in rain and look like a 5 year old designed thrm???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, we've all done so well letting the Kardashian family wither on the vine, let's not make them a topic of discussion again.

I know, I know. I so want 2025 to be the year they go away but then I read we are entering the most aesthetically atrocious time: cyber trucks, ai art, this video, etc. it is depressing.

Wut?

Cyber trucks are awesome looking and zero-emissions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure her children will really love having this "film" in their family archives.

They're being raised to not care.

For the kind of money they're being raised with, I wouldn't care either!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure her children will really love having this "film" in their family archives.

They're being raised to not care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't watch the video but thanks to PP summary and pic I get the idea, and I'm confused. Why would she do this?

Same! I could not imagine waking up one day and thinking, hmmm I should make this video.

To be fair, I doubt Kim had any creative say in this. Nadia Lee Cohen is the director; if you look up her work, you won't be surprised that this is her project. There's nothing ordinary about her work. Nadia Lee Cohen has also has worked with Kim on some of her Skims campaigns. My guess is they are friends and Nadia asked Kim to do this project with her. Of course, Kim could've said no, so clearly she wanted to do it.

Then it appears Kim is not very bright, and her "friend" lacks talent.

To the contrary... she's not stupid. This woman has made a career out of pushing boundaries and getting paid for it. This film is her genre. Always has been.

That it's still enough to start a whole thread and "break the internet" is exactly her brand.

Ah, it's the poster who always rushes to defend Kim Kartrashian, no matter what she does. Spare us all.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, we've all done so well letting the Kardashian family wither on the vine, let's not make them a topic of discussion again.

I know, I know. I so want 2025 to be the year they go away but then I read we are entering the most aesthetically atrocious time: cyber trucks, ai art, this video, etc. it is depressing.

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure her children will really love having this "film" in their family archives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't watch the video but thanks to PP summary and pic I get the idea, and I'm confused. Why would she do this?

Same! I could not imagine waking up one day and thinking, hmmm I should make this video.

To be fair, I doubt Kim had any creative say in this. Nadia Lee Cohen is the director; if you look up her work, you won't be surprised that this is her project. There's nothing ordinary about her work. Nadia Lee Cohen has also has worked with Kim on some of her Skims campaigns. My guess is they are friends and Nadia asked Kim to do this project with her. Of course, Kim could've said no, so clearly she wanted to do it.

Then it appears Kim is not very bright, and her "friend" lacks talent.

To the contrary... she's not stupid. This woman has made a career out of pushing boundaries and getting paid for it. This film is her genre. Always has been.

That it's still enough to start a whole thread and "break the internet" is exactly her brand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't watch the video but thanks to PP summary and pic I get the idea, and I'm confused. Why would she do this?

Same! I could not imagine waking up one day and thinking, hmmm I should make this video.

To be fair, I doubt Kim had any creative say in this. Nadia Lee Cohen is the director; if you look up her work, you won't be surprised that this is her project. There's nothing ordinary about her work. Nadia Lee Cohen has also has worked with Kim on some of her Skims campaigns. My guess is they are friends and Nadia asked Kim to do this project with her. Of course, Kim could've said no, so clearly she wanted to do it.

Then it appears Kim is not very bright, and her "friend" lacks talent.

To the contrary... she's not stupid. This woman has made a career out of pushing boundaries and getting paid for it. This film is her genre. Always has been.

That it's still enough to start a whole thread and "break the internet" is exactly her brand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fscking love it. Y'all will watch this woman do anything just so you can slag her off and hate at her on an anon board. That's power.

Is it high art? No. Is it art? Yes. Did it get a buttload of people completely fscking incensed over an Instagram post? Yes. Is she taking that click revenue to the bank? Also yes. Does she care about the "you're a satanist" comments? why the hell should she? She's a celebrity. If you're the type to look to celebrities for role models, well, there's your problem.

As for the "don't mock my god" nonsense, freedom of religion means that's fair play. It's not even hideously offensive. It's just bizarre. That so many people can't handle stupid, banal, bizarre posts from a celebrity nobody should even care about is the commentary. Your reaction is what elevates nonsense to art.

Stop caring and she'll stop posting. Until then, the clickbait seems to be working.

It's always the weak-minded, anti-establishment folk like PP who elevate people with not talent, just because they're provocative. I assume you love Trump too, he does exactly the same thing.

Anonymous wrote:I fscking love it. Y'all will watch this woman do anything just so you can slag her off and hate at her on an anon board. That's power.

Is it high art? No. Is it art? Yes. Did it get a buttload of people completely fscking incensed over an Instagram post? Yes. Is she taking that click revenue to the bank? Also yes. Does she care about the "you're a satanist" comments? why the hell should she? She's a celebrity. If you're the type to look to celebrities for role models, well, there's your problem.

As for the "don't mock my god" nonsense, freedom of religion means that's fair play. It's not even hideously offensive. It's just bizarre. That so many people can't handle stupid, banal, bizarre posts from a celebrity nobody should even care about is the commentary. Your reaction is what elevates nonsense to art.

Stop caring and she'll stop posting. Until then, the clickbait seems to be working.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't watch the video but thanks to PP summary and pic I get the idea, and I'm confused. Why would she do this?

Same! I could not imagine waking up one day and thinking, hmmm I should make this video.

To be fair, I doubt Kim had any creative say in this. Nadia Lee Cohen is the director; if you look up her work, you won't be surprised that this is her project. There's nothing ordinary about her work. Nadia Lee Cohen has also has worked with Kim on some of her Skims campaigns. My guess is they are friends and Nadia asked Kim to do this project with her. Of course, Kim could've said no, so clearly she wanted to do it.

Then it appears Kim is not very bright, and her "friend" lacks talent.