D3, baseball, T10, no money but a great education.

D1, soccer, GW, full ride - all in, female

Private ACC (D1 obviously), soccer, 85% all in, plus $1000 a month in "incidental money" on a debit card.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan, D1 football, full ride.

Crushing it! That's phenomenal

Football is always a free ride

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D1, Soccer, 25%, 50%, 100%, 100%

Gender matters big time with soccer.

It’s good for girls. Boys not at all.

I think every single person with a soccer playing kid already knows this. you comment is also off topic. Move along.

As a parent of a kid recruiting…but not soccer…I didn’t know this and appreciated hearing it.

why does this help you

There are more scholarships for girls in almost every sport.

Hence the rise of men in woman’s sports.

🤦‍♀️

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D1, Soccer, 25%, 50%, 100%, 100%

Gender matters big time with soccer.

It’s good for girls. Boys not at all.

I think every single person with a soccer playing kid already knows this. you comment is also off topic. Move along.

As a parent of a kid recruiting…but not soccer…I didn’t know this and appreciated hearing it.

why does this help you

There are more scholarships for girls in almost every sport.

Hence the rise of men in woman’s sports.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Merit aid is not a loophole to give D3 athletes athletic scholarships. The amount would be similar with/without athletic status for the same student.

If it's holistic, you an prove that the athlete with lower stats didn't have some other aspect of his application that was better than the non-athlete non-recipient with higher stats.

Can't prove*

Anonymous wrote:Merit aid is not a loophole to give D3 athletes athletic scholarships. The amount would be similar with/without athletic status for the same student.

If it's holistic, you an prove that the athlete with lower stats didn't have some other aspect of his application that was better than the non-athlete non-recipient with higher stats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Private or public?
D1, D2 or D3?
What percentage of tuition did you get in scholarship?
Which sport if you don’t mention saying?

Private
D3
ACADEMIC scholarship 50% Soccer

Ah yes, the ACADEMIC scholarship

Anonymous wrote:Public
D1
70% coverage of tuition (not room and board)
track

Private (top ranked school in Power 4)
80 percent - all but board - turned down a number of Big 10 and SEC schools at 100 percent.

Track - very highly ranked from 10th grade on.

Regretted my choice - elitist people did not treat me well as a poor kid. No parents in my life.

Anonymous wrote:Michigan, D1 football, full ride.

Crushing it! That's phenomenal

D3 softball. Private. Merit scholarship 36% of tuition. Coach used one of her slots for kid (who would have been admitted anyway but process simplified with coach boost). Coach had no contact with admissions re: merit award, separate convo that took place at time of pre-read. Was provided a potential range for merit award based on '24 class then and number in acceptance letter was near top of that range

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D1, Soccer, 25%, 50%, 100%, 100%

Gender matters big time with soccer.

It’s good for girls. Boys not at all.

I think every single person with a soccer playing kid already knows this. you comment is also off topic. Move along.

As a parent of a kid recruiting…but not soccer…I didn’t know this and appreciated hearing it.

+1. What a rude response. Who made PP class monitor?

Recruited DC at 2 different NESCACs (D3) - only a couple of those schools (not the ones my DC go to) give merit aid.

Public
D1
70% coverage of tuition (not room and board)
track