Anonymous wrote:Water skiing is superior to snow skiing in every metric.
Anonymous wrote:Water skiing is superior to snow skiing in every metric.
Anonymous wrote:Its easy and free in the old country. It's like going for a walk in winter wonderland, but moving much faster plus the exercise.
The skis and equipment is 100 times better than when I was growing up.
Anyone can make circles in their small village or find trails. Nobody pays for it or travels to trails unless they want mountains.
Same with iceskating as man made rinks, ponds, rivers and lakes are everywhere.The roads are one big icefield.
Golf? Come on. I would have to look for it, drive there and pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand it either. It's definitely an aspirational sport. People who do it either are rich or want to appear so. My husband grew up skiing and likes it so he made sure our two kids learned to ski. One likes it as much as DH does and the other one hangs out on the greens with me. If I never ski again its totally fine with me. I've mostly just put up with it to appease DH.
I agree that you are supposed to like it if you're wealthy enough. No one pressures you to like table tennis or open water swimming or hiking, but you are expected to like skiing. I've been to some of the best ski fields in the world and usually seek out the rec center and swimming pool because I really dislike skiing. I'm happier spending $10 to swim than hundreds to be cold, scared and bruised. The rest of my family seems to like skiing.
I'm the same. I've had lots of experiences at resorts that are considered the best, but I'd rather go for a challenging hike. I absolutely think the reason hiking doesn't have the same caché in wealthy circles is that it's so cheap. No granted, I've gone hiking in Switzerland and Peru and Scotland where I've stayed at amazing hotels and spent plenty of money. But since you can also just go hike the Billy Goat trail for free, it's not sufficiently exclusive for a lot of people.
It is funny at the high end resorts how many people don't ski, too. Lots of people there with families or colleagues who just do the lodge and aprés ski activities and never go out on the slopes, or might go for a half day once but that it (because they don't really like it!).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand it either. It's definitely an aspirational sport. People who do it either are rich or want to appear so. My husband grew up skiing and likes it so he made sure our two kids learned to ski. One likes it as much as DH does and the other one hangs out on the greens with me. If I never ski again its totally fine with me. I've mostly just put up with it to appease DH.
I agree that you are supposed to like it if you're wealthy enough. No one pressures you to like table tennis or open water swimming or hiking, but you are expected to like skiing. I've been to some of the best ski fields in the world and usually seek out the rec center and swimming pool because I really dislike skiing. I'm happier spending $10 to swim than hundreds to be cold, scared and bruised. The rest of my family seems to like skiing.
Anonymous wrote:Its easy and free in the old country. It's like going for a walk in winter wonderland, but moving much faster plus the exercise.
The skis and equipment is 100 times better than when I was growing up.
Anyone can make circles in their small village or find trails. Nobody pays for it or travels to trails unless they want mountains.
Same with iceskating as man made rinks, ponds, rivers and lakes are everywhere.The roads are one big icefield.
Golf? Come on. I would have to look for it, drive there and pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people go out to eat when you can have unsalted unsweetened cold oatmeal at home? Who can know these things
Why would someone living in Tokyo insist on flying to LA for tacos instead of just enjoying great sushi and ramen in Tokyo? That's a more apt comparison to people who spend 10s of thousands on ski trips a couple times a year.