Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

No, I don’t think this is plausible at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intruder. The parents did not kill their child, nor did the brother.

Not one bit of an evidence there was an intruder.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

No, I don’t think this is plausible at all.

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would John Ramsey keep pushing the police to test items for DNA if he was involved? Wouldn’t he have slunk away by now if he knew what really happened? It’s not like OJ was seriously asking questions trying to solve Nicole’s murder after he was found not guilty. Plus that police officer was convinced he was the murderer even though the popular theory is that Burke might have done it.

Because he was emboldened by the fact that it did not below to members of the family. Even though the minuscule amount of DNA is thought most likely to be touch DNA from the manufacturing of the underpants.

Anonymous wrote:Intruder. The parents did not kill their child, nor did the brother.

Anonymous wrote:Why would John Ramsey keep pushing the police to test items for DNA if he was involved? Wouldn’t he have slunk away by now if he knew what really happened? It’s not like OJ was seriously asking questions trying to solve Nicole’s murder after he was found not guilty. Plus that police officer was convinced he was the murderer even though the popular theory is that Burke might have done it.

Anonymous wrote:What about the basement window being smashed and the suitcase underneath?

Anonymous wrote:While I understand that, to get the interview, it had to heavily biased, it rehashed the same info that’s been out forever and clearly had an agenda.

Does anyone have a rec for a podcast or doc that fully explores all theories without trying to promote one as the truth?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

Yes, I don't want to get into any graphic details, but using a paintbrush as opposed to... some part of the body let's say... to do that kind of thing makes me believe it was not an adult male. It was either a woman, or a prepubescent male.

Agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

Yes, I don't want to get into any graphic details, but using a paintbrush as opposed to... some part of the body let's say... to do that kind of thing makes me believe it was not an adult male. It was either a woman, or a prepubescent male.